General Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Should the time limit for terminations be reduced?
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Nanna Gaynor (June nr Preston's Daughter) | Report | 20 May 2008 13:46 |
I think it should be reduced... |
|||
|
Kay???? | Report | 20 May 2008 13:48 |
|
|||
|
MarionfromScotland | Report | 20 May 2008 13:49 |
I heard today they are now saying that at 18 weeks...they feel pain. |
|||
|
X Lairy- Fairy | Report | 20 May 2008 14:12 |
I think in this day and age there shouldn't be so many unwanted pregnancies .(if you dont know your having a baby by 20 weeks your not likey to know till its born) |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
AnninGlos | Report | 20 May 2008 14:14 |
My opinion is that it should be reduced to 20 weeks, unless there is a subsequent health risk to the Mother. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
McAnne's Gahan-Crazy | Report | 20 May 2008 14:17 |
Yes - it's very easy to say women should be more careful if they don't want children etc |
|||
|
Roxanne | Report | 20 May 2008 14:17 |
personally I would like see it reduced even more than 20 weeks,but its a start. |
|||
|
Roxanne | Report | 20 May 2008 14:20 |
loopy lou, |
|||
|
CMD | Report | 20 May 2008 15:14 |
I do not agree with abortions, |
|||
|
Teddys Girl | Report | 20 May 2008 15:39 |
I would not like to go back to the back street abortions, as film Vera Drake. but I do think that in this day of contraception being easy, there are too many abortions. |
|||
|
covlass | Report | 20 May 2008 15:46 |
I think it should be reduced to 16 weeks unless its advised on medical grounds. I had a complications with my 2nd child & had to have regular scans I remember 1 scan at 21 weeks seeing my baby tiny but formed, my daughter was born premature & survived. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Gwyn in Kent | Report | 20 May 2008 15:56 |
From the NHS site........ |
|||
|
Teddys Girl | Report | 20 May 2008 16:01 |
Your right Gwyn, |
|||
|
♫ Penny € | Report | 20 May 2008 16:08 |
Here are some stats from the BBC website |
|||
|
Roxanne | Report | 20 May 2008 16:09 |
I do think that if the mothers life is in danger or if the child has got severe deformities then it should be allowed. |
|||
|
TinaElizabeth | Report | 20 May 2008 17:26 |
Some one said at 20 wks its fully formed, which they are of course right. It got me thinking that my friends daughter who lost a baby at 16 wks.She had a picture of her son and although he was very red he too was fully formed not like a full term baby in colour but apart from that he was fully formed so maybe it should be even lower. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Gypsy | Report | 20 May 2008 21:24 |
Yes I think it should be lowered. |
|||
|
donna | Report | 20 May 2008 22:06 |
i dont think abortions should be allowed so late on. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Shelli4 | Report | 20 May 2008 22:13 |
two people quoted the morning after pill, remember that isn't 100% - trust me I know and he'll be 10 in September!!!! |
|||
|
Jessie aka Maddies mate | Report | 20 May 2008 22:15 |
I think it should be reduced to 20 weeks if it is not for medical reasons. |