Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Final cry for help - certs received
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
JenW | Report | 4 Feb 2009 01:15 |
I wonder.... |
|||
|
EvieBeavie | Report | 4 Feb 2009 01:16 |
Yes. I'd been trying 1891 and was about to move on to 1901. ;) |
|||
|
EvieBeavie | Report | 4 Feb 2009 01:19 |
Also been trying to find deaths for the durned parents. |
|||
|
BatMansDaughter | Report | 4 Feb 2009 01:20 |
Looks very good Jen, just be nice to place her with Celly thingamajiggy!!! |
|||
|
BatMansDaughter | Report | 4 Feb 2009 01:34 |
Can we tie this one in??? |
|||
|
BatMansDaughter | Report | 4 Feb 2009 01:37 |
What do you think??? |
|||
|
BatMansDaughter | Report | 4 Feb 2009 01:39 |
1851 England Census |
|||
|
EvieBeavie | Report | 4 Feb 2009 01:39 |
I'd say so. ;) |
|||
|
EvieBeavie | Report | 4 Feb 2009 01:43 |
Fine, I'm going home. Saw the 1851 census when I went to post the 1868 marriage, didn't realize you'd already put the marriage. |
|||
|
BatMansDaughter | Report | 4 Feb 2009 01:43 |
And look where Henry and Emma are in 1901 |
|||
|
EvieBeavie | Report | 4 Feb 2009 01:47 |
yeah -- but where the #*(&$#% are theyin 1891??? |
|||
|
EvieBeavie | Report | 4 Feb 2009 01:50 |
Well, here they are in 1891, but devoid of niece. |
|||
|
BatMansDaughter | Report | 4 Feb 2009 01:50 |
Drat!!!!! Sarah/Emily isn't with them in 1891!!!! |
|||
|
BatMansDaughter | Report | 4 Feb 2009 01:50 |
SNAP!!!! |
|||
|
EvieBeavie | Report | 4 Feb 2009 01:59 |
Nyah ha ha. Hmm. |
|||
|
EvieBeavie | Report | 4 Feb 2009 02:05 |
One possibility I've been looking for is that by 1891 she was simply shacked up with somebody and appears under his surname. She would have been 18, it would have been possible ... |
|||
|
BatMansDaughter | Report | 4 Feb 2009 02:06 |
Looks very likely to be her, seeing as they have a son the same age so as you say, she can't be a daughter to the family. |
|||
|
EvieBeavie | Report | 4 Feb 2009 02:08 |
Okay, kill Emily Bennett. |
|||
|
BatMansDaughter | Report | 4 Feb 2009 02:14 |
You can't kill her, anyway she'll be already dead!!!! |
|||
|
BatMansDaughter | Report | 4 Feb 2009 02:59 |
Stuck now, but did find this; |