Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|
Debra
|
Report
|
25 Nov 2007 13:52 |
I wonder if anyone could help me. I'm quite excited to have found this information and have lots of questions and need a point in the right direction from others who are more experienced. Any help greatly appreciated. I have just found that my great-great-great grandfather born c1809 was born in Botany Bay Sidney Australia. I have this info from the 1851 census when hre is living in Great Yarmouth. He must have come to England before 1835 as the census shows he had a son born in Gt Yarmouth in that year. I can find no records of any Youens in Australia. Although I am not totally sure where I am supposed to be looking. If he was born in Sydney why did he come to England? If he was the son of a convict would he have been able to come here. Would the cost of passage to England been alot? He was a sugar boiler, how could he afford it? Did he return with his parents? Why were they in Australia if they were not convicts? (I can find no record of any Youens in the convicts records). Maybe I'm not looking in the right places? Many Thanks and Kind Regards Debbie
|
|
elddau1
|
Report
|
25 Nov 2007 14:43 |
Debra try looking for the birth in sydney at www.bdm.nsw.gov.au/familyHistory/search.htm this is the New South Wales registry of births deaths and marriages site - indexes. unfortuntely i don't think it has soundex etc, so you'll have to try different spelling versions with separate searches. chriss
|
|
Staffs Col
|
Report
|
25 Nov 2007 14:57 |
Possibly the child of a soldier stationed in Botany Bay, Try also having a look at:
http://members.innet.net.au/-perthdps/convicts/index.html
http://cedir.uow.edu.au/programs/FirstFleet/
http://www.freemantleprison.com
and
http://www.medicalpioneers.com
Col
|
|
Debra
|
Report
|
25 Nov 2007 15:03 |
Thank you Chriss I have tried that but there is no record of him. I'm not sure what to do next.
|
|
Potty
|
Report
|
25 Nov 2007 16:40 |
Have you found him and his son in 1841? I have done a search but nothing is coming up in Norfolk.
What christian names are we lookig for - can't find him in 1851 either.
|
|
GlitterBaby
|
Report
|
25 Nov 2007 16:45 |
1851 just for info
Name: Isaac Youen Age: 42 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1809 Relation: Head Spouse's Name: Maryann Gender: Male Where born: Botary Bay Sidney Civil Parish: Great Yarmouth Town: Great Yarmouth County/Island: Norfolk Country: England Street address:
Occupation: sugar boiler
Condition as to marriage:
Disability: View Image Registration district: Yarmouth Sub-registration district: Yarmouth Northern ED, institution, or vessel: 1h Neighbors: View others on page Household schedule number: 131 Household Members: Name Age Francis Youen 1 Isaac Youen 42 Isaac Youen 14 Gt Yarmouth Joseph Youen 4 Maryann Youen 46 Gt Yarmouth Maryann Youen 5 William Youen 16 Gt Yarmouth At least I presume this is the family
1841 possible but need to check the image Name: Isaac Gowen Age: 4 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1837 Gender: Male Where born: Norfolk, England Civil Parish: Great Yarmouth Hundred: Great Yarmouth County/Island: Norfolk Country: England Street address:
Occupation: Registration district: Great Yarmouth Sub-registration district: Northern Neighbors: View others on page Household Members: Name Age Isaac Gowen 30 Isaac Gowen 4 Mary Gowen 35 William Gowen 7 Elizabeth Newman 10 Harriet Newman 2 Mary Newman 35 Mary Newman 15 Sarah Newman 2 Image is not clear and the surname has been altered
1861 poss Name: Isaac Yawen Age: 52 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1809 Relation: Head Spouse's Name: Mary Gender: Male Where born: New South Wales, Lydney - Sydney on image Civil Parish: Great Yarmouth St Nicholas Ecclesiastical parish: Norwich Town: Great Yarmouth County/Island: Norfolk Country: England Registration district: Yarmouth Sub-registration district: Yarmouth Northern ED, institution, or vessel: 3 Neighbors: View others on page Household schedule number: 77 Household Members: Name Age Francis Yawen 11 Isaac Yawen 52 Joseph Yawen 14 Mary Yawen 56 Mary A Yawen 15
|
|
Potty
|
Report
|
25 Nov 2007 16:55 |
Image for the 1841 that Glitter Baby found has him not born in county - nothing in country column
I wonder if he could be the son of a sailor - wives sometimes travelled with their husbands
|
|
Debra
|
Report
|
25 Nov 2007 19:10 |
Glitter baby. I think that definately looks like him in 1861. The stuff from 1851 is what I have for him, and it all matches up. Thank you for that. Will check the Gowan info, but it looks to match uo as well. Interesting that in both the 1841 and 1861 census the names are wrong. Thats an interesting point Potty. I have no idea just yet whether his father was a sailor, Thanks everyone for your help so far. You are very kind. Debbie
|
|
Heather
|
Report
|
26 Nov 2007 08:51 |
How interesting, there cant be many people with that place of birth. There are a number of sites for aussie convicts etc.
He could have been the son of a soldier who was there to guard said convicts and Id have thought he could have returned either with his parents or worked his passage back.
Whatever, his parents must have been some of the first people there!
|
|
Heather
|
Report
|
26 Nov 2007 08:53 |
Oh, just found this on a google search - its a list of sugar refiners!!
YOUEN Isaac of Botany Bay, Sydney (sugar boiler) (age 42) (North Market Rd) Gt Yarmouth 1851 1851 census HO107/1806/592
http://home.clara.net/mawer/sugaryy.html
|
|
Heather
|
Report
|
26 Nov 2007 09:09 |
Possible marriage???
nty Norfolk Place Norwich Church St Paul BT RegisterNumber MarriageDate 20 Jun 1833 GroomForename Isaac GroomSurname YOUEN
GroomAbode BrideForename Mary BrideSurname GARNER WitnessOneForename Joseph WitnessOneSurname HEADLEY WitnessTwoForename Martha WitnessTwoSurname SEAMAN Notes Groom signed with an X; Bride signed her name; Married by Banns
|
|
Lewella
|
Report
|
26 Nov 2007 09:36 |
I wonder if this is a match, remembering if they couldn't read or write Youen sounds like Ewing. These are from BDM NSW
Birth: Registration number and year: V18081929 1A/1808 EWING, ISAAC Father: ISAAC Mother: ELIZABETH
Marriage:
Registration number and year: V1806351 4/1806 Groom: EWING, ISAAC Bride: EADLY, ELIZABETH
Eadly and Headley are also very similar!
|
|
TonyOz
|
Report
|
26 Nov 2007 10:36 |
This might be worth looking at also. The spelling of YOUEN may vary on records/Index's in Australia, written as it sounded YOUEN = EWEN = EWING Its quite possible that Isaac 1809 could be the the son of a soldier stationed here.
Colonial Secretary Index, 1788-1825 http://www.records.nsw.gov.au/archives/colonial_secretary_1788-1825_252.asp
EWEN, Isaac. Private 1811 Sep 11 On return of a detachment of 102nd Regiment left in New South Wales (Reel 6043; 4/1726 p.163a) EWENS see also EWEN; EWING; EWINS
Tony. ( Australia )
|
|
Debra
|
Report
|
26 Nov 2007 11:38 |
Hi Heather, Yes I too found him on Google as a sugar refiner. I've spent all morning looking for sugar factories in Gt Yarmouth from that time. It is interesting that he was born in Botany Bay and returned to England isnt it? I'm still mulling. Wow marriage records yes I believe they are correct. That is definately them... Thank you. Joseph Headley became a family name, as in sons and grandsons were later named Joseph Headley Youen. But more interesting is Martha Seaman. Later Joseph Headley Youen, who was Isaac and Marys Grandson (born 1873) married Daisy Seaman (born 1882). there must be a connection there. Thank you Heather. Regards Debbie
|
|
Debra
|
Report
|
26 Nov 2007 11:52 |
Hi Lew, I think you've got it. So You are saying that according to these records my G-G-G Grandfather Isaac Youen (Ewing) was born in 1808. His father was also called Isaac and his mother was Elizabeth Eadley (H)eadley. And Elizabeth and Isaac were married in 1806 in New South Wales. Thank you so much for your help. You are all very kind Regards Debbie
|
|
Heather
|
Report
|
26 Nov 2007 11:55 |
So pleased that marriage was the right one - lovely when you can tie it in through witnesses.
I also think this chap must be the son of a soldier or marine as he would have been there virtually at the right time - I see marines first went out in 1802. That private that Lew found seems very likely.Very interesting isnt it!
|
|
Debra
|
Report
|
26 Nov 2007 12:06 |
Hello Tony Thank you for that information. I'm not exactly sure what it means though. I wonder if you could clarify for me. Does this say they Private Isaac Ewen returned to England on a boat that left in Sept 1811? Or that he was posted somewhere else on that date? Thank you again Debbie
|
|
Debra
|
Report
|
26 Nov 2007 12:12 |
Heather, I have just realised that their first son was called William Garner Youen. So you most definately were right. its great to have so much help. Thanks
Debbie
|
|
TonyOz
|
Report
|
26 Nov 2007 13:27 |
Hi Debra. Sorry, but i cant give you a positive answer if he returned to England in 1811.
If you feel this was your Private Isaac Ewen of the 102 regiment( New South Wales Corps ) then this information below may explain a bit more.
73rd Royal Highlanders The 1st Battalion of the 73rd Regiment landed in Sydney on 1 January 1810 and took over duties from the New South Wales Corps (102nd Regiment). It was thus the first of many British line regiments that garrisoned New South Wales for the next sixty years.
102nd Regiment of Foot New South Wales Corps ("The Rum Corps") Active... 1789 to 1810. Country... United Kingdom Branch.... Marines Type Line ...Infantry Role Light.. Infantry Size One battalion Nickname.. Rum Corps, Botany Bay rangers, Rum Puncheon Corps, The Condemned. Colors... Yellow Facings, White Braided Lace March Quick: Slow: Battles/wars Battle of Vinegar Hill (1804), Rum Rebellion (1808)
102nd Regiment. In 1809, after the Rum Rebellion, the NSW Corps was formed into the 102nd Regiment of Foot and recalled. A few of its officers and long servicing privates were used to bring Macquarie’s 73rd regiment up to near full strength; around 100 veterans and invalids were retained for garrison duty in NSW (though of little real use the unit survived till 1823); some officers were allowed to retire and farm their land; and the bulk of the troops were sent back to England. Colonel Paterson, formerly Captain Paterson, died in South Africa on the way.
In England, most personnel were transferred to Veteran or Garrison battalions with most officers ending up in the 8th Royal Veteran Battalion. The regiment was reconstituted with new recruits and then served in various posts throughout the United Kingdom: Horsham in 1811 and the Channel Islands of Guernsey in 1812. In 1812 the Regiment was posted to Bermuda and then Nova Scotia. In the War of 1812 they took part in seaborne raids along the US Atlantic coast and other actions against the Americans and were involved in the British capture of Maine. Detachments of the 102nd remained on both sides of the border between the British colony of New Brunswick and the US State of Maine after the war's end in December of 1814.
After the wars against Napoleonic France and the United States, the British Army disbanded many units for the sake of economy and the 102nd Regiment was renumbered as the 100th Regiment of Foot in 1816. The 100th were the last British troops to occupy the United States with the last detachments returning to Chatham Barracks in England where the regiment was disbanded on March 24th, 1818.
At a loss with what to do with the disbanded veterans, some of whom remembered NSW fondly, they were offered the chance to reform the NSW Corps as a garrison unit. They arrived in Sydney in July 1826 and were placed under the command of Colonel Dumaresq. In 1829 the Royal New South Wales Veterans Companies, or Veterans Corps, had about 150 men serving at various posts in NSW, Norfolk Island and Tasmania. It was finally disbanded on 1st April 1833.
Throughout its life the regiment acquired a number of nicknames related to its service in New South Wales: Botany Bay Rangers, Rum Puncheon Corps, Condemned Regiment, Rum Corps.
Cheers.Tony
|
|
Heather
|
Report
|
26 Nov 2007 13:30 |
You could check out if Kew have the military records for him.
By the way, that marriage was taken from the parish register through freereg so it will be accurate. Have you tried looking for the witnesses on the census now?
|