Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
London 1871 and 1891 Lookups- No more whilst I fin
| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Sylvie | Report | 16 Oct 2003 15:07 |
|
FOR TRACEY I'm struggling with this Do you know the registration district, is it on the 81 census? Sylvie |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Sylvie | Report | 16 Oct 2003 15:10 |
|
FOR EILEEN - not David sorry! Not on the London census - pretty sure it is in middlesex, I used to go there in my teens! Sylvie |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Sylvie | Report | 16 Oct 2003 15:50 |
|
FOR JANET Almost Hurruh - I found Livingstone Terrace in the end........the master index is missing anything between lei and lou!!!! With 42 discs and nearly 1000 istreet ndex pages........... Anyway No 8 Livingstone Terrace contains the family Taylor (Head born Colnbrooke Bucks). Large family - no other families in the same house Sorry Sylvie |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Janet | Report | 16 Oct 2003 17:38 |
|
Hi Sylvie, Thanks very much for trying. I only found out there was more than one family in each house when I moved on to the next household, it went No. 7, No. 8 then back to 7 then back to 8 again practically all through the street. Most strange unless they were actually split houses and now would be 7, 7a etc. What I did find out though as I went through trying to find the adjoining streets was that at No. 3 there was an Elizabeth Elliot. This may turn out to be Alfred's 2nd wife and my g grandmother. First possible lead I have had on her. So even though it looks as if Alfred didn't live there in 1871 so no lead on his 1st wife it may be good news after all. Thanks again Janet |
|||
|
Sue | Report | 16 Oct 2003 17:47 |
|
Hi Sylvie Thanks for trying. 66 Southdean Gardens definitely exists, but I had trouble tracing it on 1901 census. Have no more suggestions, thanks for looking. Just had a thought - it may be Wimbledon - but I think that comes under Surrey. Sue |
|||