Genealogy Chat

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Quick Search

Single word search

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

Desperate for help!

Page 1 + 1 of 2

  1. «
  2. 1
  3. 2
ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

Tin Fields

Tin Fields Report 5 Nov 2005 17:59

Hi Jim Well! Why on earth can I not have a more ' distinctive' name to work with? I had always thought that they married before then because Elizabeth/Sarah was listed as Shaw in 1891, maybe not though?

Tin Fields

Tin Fields Report 5 Nov 2005 18:02

Thanks Nell, thats good to know, I think short of ref checking every entry I'm running out of options

Tin Fields

Tin Fields Report 5 Nov 2005 18:07

Just wanted to say Thank you to you all for looking for me! Lisa

Unknown

Unknown Report 5 Nov 2005 18:11

Sarah/Elizabeth Mayall and Arthur - do you know where they were in 1881? nell

Tin Fields

Tin Fields Report 5 Nov 2005 18:14

Nell, No I don't, I even tried looking for a marriage using Elizabeth/Sarah Mayall, the only Arthur I can find is in Mossley with an Ellen Mayall and a Sarah Ann age 7 months, living as boarders,

Unknown

Unknown Report 5 Nov 2005 20:03

That's one I found, but wasn't sure of. There seem to have been a few Mayall families around. I was just thinking that maybe Elizabeth/Sarah and James didn't marry at all, or married later - possibly Elizabeth/Sarah's 1st husband was still around somewhere. In that case the children might have been registered as Mayall (though I couldn't find them either on Freebmd, but they might be on 1837online). It was quite possible for couples to pretend to be married on the census. Alternatively - and I've obviously been watching too many far-fetched films, perhaps Sarah and Elizabeth were twin sisters, one good and one bad and the bad one bumped off the good one!!!! nell