Genealogy Chat

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Quick Search

Single word search

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

SURNAMES-THE TOP 10

Page 1 + 1 of 2

  1. «
  2. 1
  3. 2
ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

Jennie

Jennie Report 12 Dec 2005 21:49

Good site. One of my husband's names is Jarnell. This shows as 64, ranking = 43667 but I still have trouble finding them all. Jennie

Historyman

Historyman Report 12 Dec 2005 21:59

My posting of The ONS statistics list of 2002 has raised a few interesting points. As we all know we have to contend with variant spellings of a surname, but with this easy to use surname finder you can quickly see how many known variants of your surname still existed in the year 2002. The introduction of on-line census this year enables total numbers of a particular surname to be compared in each 10 year period. I wonder if anyone else has made statistical comparisons with their surname being researched? The totals shown below for the surname Whincup include variants. 1851 370. 1861. 465 1871. 564. 1881. 633. 1891 618. 1901 827 The total for 2002 including variants is circa 800, indicating, as regards our surname almost the same figure as 1901. If anyone else has done similar statistical checks on surnames I would be interested to know if a similar trend is evident. It is also interesting to plot main areas for a surname. In our case largest group originates in Yorkshire, with another large group Suffolk/Norfolk based. Ray Whincup

Liz

Liz Report 12 Dec 2005 22:16

We Mardel-Ferreiras (official name!) only just scrape into the list with 6 names making it the 203,151st. Most of the family (in UK since 1860s) have dropped the second half (the Portuguese equivalent of Smith) as no one can spell it! My maiden name McMeeking appears 131 times making it the 27,909th - but then there are around 70 different ways of spelling it which makes searching hard work! Then there are the Joneses and the Powells .............. ! Liz

Liz

Liz Report 12 Dec 2005 22:25

Ah - Ray - Where did you find the number of name variations and which areas they come from? - I'm very thick at this, I can't see anything else to click on! Liz

Heather

Heather Report 12 Dec 2005 22:32

So I get count 235 Ranking 19000 and count 908 ranking 7147 Can someone translate please? Surely that doesnt mean there are only 235 of us??

Historyman

Historyman Report 12 Dec 2005 22:45

In reply to Liz re name variations. Going back over the years, when many people could not read, or write, a name would be entered in, say, a parish register, or census return 'as heard'. Over the years these spellings became the known variants. In our case main spelling is Whincup, but also includes Whincop, Wincup, Winkup etc. See also Olde Crone's list under this thread for variations on his name. You can also see variations of spelling by using 'soundex' on search of BMD indexes etc. Hope this answers your query Ray Whincup

Heather

Heather Report 12 Dec 2005 22:58

I feel part of a threatened species now - do you reckon I could get grants to nurture me?

Liz

Liz Report 12 Dec 2005 23:10

Thanks Ray, yes, 'As heard' obviously produced a lot of variations - when my great-aunt died in Cheltenham and her sister gave the name McMeeking it was recorded as 'McMichum'! I'll have to try the Soundex. There are 55 different spellings in the OPRs for Wigtownshire alone, plus several more in Kirkcudbrightshire. Liz