Genealogy Chat

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Quick Search

Single word search

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

Mother's Maiden name Pre 1911

Page 0 + 1 of 2

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. »
ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

AustinQ

AustinQ Report 4 Nov 2016 13:32

New search from the GRO allows you to see mother's maiden names on most pre 1911 birth indexes.

Brought to our attention by the wonderful MaureeninNY

"The GRO now has mmn pre-1911.
https://www.gro.gov.uk/gro/content/certificates/login.asp

You do have to register/log in"

AustinQ

AustinQ Report 4 Nov 2016 13:37

I have just found an 1883 birth that I have spent a fortune trying to find over the years- I now know it's the correct one as it includes a maiden name!.

Potty has reported she keeps getting an error message- so perhaps we're clogging the site up. Let's hope it settles down.

This is fantastic news and will save many of us a small fortune.

Potty

Potty Report 4 Nov 2016 14:06

Just found and sent in a correction for a mistranscribed surname.

MaureeninNY

MaureeninNY Report 4 Nov 2016 17:14

:-D :-D

Thanks Austin Q!

Just realised that the pre 1865ish deaths also now show age at death.
Very helpful.

Maureen

malyon

malyon Report 4 Nov 2016 17:28

do you have to pay to use that site

AustinQ

AustinQ Report 4 Nov 2016 17:32

No Malyon- it's free!!

You just need to register with a valid e-mail address. If you've ordered from the GRO before you'll probably be in the system and you just need to validate your email.

AustinQ

AustinQ Report 4 Nov 2016 17:38

Maureen, I can't tell you just how helpful the new search has been. I've just discovered my Gran had another two children- sadly both died and didn't appear on any census, but it helps to build a fuller picture of what her life must have been like- and I can order the certificates without guessing which are correct.

MaureeninNY

MaureeninNY Report 4 Nov 2016 17:53

It certainly does help fill in the blanks!


I can see I'll have to block out a few hours and hopefully find possible deaths for my John and Ann WEST between 1851 and 1861.

A freebie from the government! Whatever are they thinking?? :-S

Maureen

AustinQ

AustinQ Report 4 Nov 2016 18:04

:-D

Perhaps we should keep quiet about it!

+++DetEcTive+++

+++DetEcTive+++ Report 5 Nov 2016 14:07

According to Lost Cousins newsletter, there will be the option to buy digitalised copies for £6 from 9 Nov. Only a limited number of purchases will be available within the trial period.
.......
The trial will last for only 3 weeks, but may close earlier (only 45,000 PDFs will be made available at this price). My guess is that those 45,000 PDFs will be sold very, very quickly -
Births: 1837 to 1934
Deaths: 1837 to 1957

http://lostcousins.com/newsletters2/specialnov16news.htm#PDFtrial

nameslessone

nameslessone Report 5 Nov 2016 14:20

It works! :-D

But if only OH's 4x gr grandmother had managed to go on having children for another 4/5 years I might have found out her surname. It wasn't on her death certificate as it was one of illiterate sons that notified the death. :-(

SylviaInCanada

SylviaInCanada Report 5 Nov 2016 23:21

The only snag that I have found is that Deaths seem unable to distinguish between months and years ........ the new images only show the age by a number


so a baby who dies at 6 months old (shown on the certificate) and a child who dies at age 6 years will both show on the new image as 6 ...................

it becomes important when finding children born and died between censuses.


Plus ................ mmn is NOT shown on every image of a birth registration.

I found a lot of mine without mmn, so was still unsure of whether I had the correct children, especially in families that all used the same forenames, over and over again.

MaureeninNY

MaureeninNY Report 6 Nov 2016 01:54

I FOUND MY ANCESTOR's death
within 2 minutes......

Moxx

Syls-the bumph and the obvious <3

greyghost

greyghost Report 6 Nov 2016 16:37

Having married in 1856, I've found out that one set of Gt Gt Grandparents had 2 babies born and died same quarter - their first 2 within 2 years - and then their 4th and 7th died too. All between census! So 14 children, not 10 and they outlived a further 4.

greyghost

greyghost Report 7 Nov 2016 12:58

Logged on today to see this - one way to cut down the rush for cheap copies as per lost cousins link given above 5th Nov. at 1407

Essential Maintenance & New functionality available

The website will be unavailable on Wednesday 9th November 2016 between 07:30 and 08:30 for essential maintenance to take place.

We apologise to customers for any inconvenience caused.

etc

Potty

Potty Report 9 Nov 2016 12:55

Bumping this up to remind people that today is the start of the trial for ordering PDFs for £6. Anybody done this yet?

Have noticed that some birth entries do not have MMN. Assumed at first that this was for illegitimate births but have found quite a lot for the Farnham district that do not have MMN for births that I know weren't illegitimate. So, shouldn't have assumed!

AustinQ

AustinQ Report 9 Nov 2016 13:41

Yes- just bought PDF certificate £6.00.

Will be sent by e-mail, estimated delivery 16th November. Will let you know more when it arrives.

AustinQ

AustinQ Report 13 Nov 2016 11:24

Just received my PDF certificate via email!

Looks to be a scanned copy of the original certificate- very pleased :-D

Sheila

Sheila Report 21 Nov 2016 16:53

I have just received my fathers birth certificate 1857 I must have ordered and got about six different certificates. The place shown of his birth on census was Paddington but other children born Islington, St Luke's but found due to mothers maiden name which I knew he was born Marylebone New church Street, his father was a omnibus conductor so I am a happy person.

mgnv

mgnv Report 25 Nov 2016 07:40

AustinQ - My guess is your pdf is a scan of the GRO's copy of the original register. The original register is held at the local office that holds all the rego's for that subdistrict, as well as the original registrar's marr rego's, plus the local copies of church rego's.



The new GRO index leaves surnames blank on illegitimate births where there is np father listed. E.g.,

Baptism: 30 Nov 1879 St Wilfrid, Standish, Lancashire, England
Elizabeth Ellen Benson - [Child] of Kate Benson
Abode: Standish
Baptised by: R. Duncan Curate
Register: Baptisms 1879 - 1885, Page 1, Entry 3
Source: LDS Film 1526140

Baptism: 14 Dec 1879 St Wilfrid, Standish, Lancashire, England
John Thomas Sutton - [Child] of Ann Sutton
Abode: Shevington
Baptised by: R. Duncan Curate
Register: Baptisms 1879 - 1885, Page 1, Entry 4
Source: LDS Film 1526140

Lancashire Birth indexes for the years: 1879
Surname Forename(s) Mother's Maiden Name Sub-District Registers At Reference
BENSON Elizabeth Ellen BENSON Standish Wigan & Leigh STND/21/491
SUTTON John Thomas SUTTON Standish Wigan & Leigh STND/21/434
1912 ACKERS Eric Clarkson ACKERS Hindley Wigan & Leigh HNDL/183/30

Births Dec 1879 (>99%)
Benson Elizabeth Ellen Wigan 8c 7
Sutton John Thomas Wigan 8c 2

BENSON, ELIZABETH ELLEN - Order
GRO Reference: 1879 D Quarter in WIGAN Volume 08C Page 7

SUTTON, JOHN THOMAS - Order
GRO Reference: 1879 D Quarter in WIGAN Volume 08C Page 2





Oddly enough, this happens even post 1911q2

Baptism: 29 Feb 1912 Christ Church, Ince, Lancs.
Eric Clarkson Ackers - [Child] of Alice Mary Gladys Ackers
Born: 19 Jan 1912
Abode: 232 Ince Green Lane
Baptised by: R. Whitehead
Register: Baptisms 1905 - 1915, Page 207, Entry 1653
Source: Original Register at Wigan Archives

Lancashire Birth indexes for the years: 1912
Surname Forename(s) Mother's Maiden Name Sub-District Registers At Reference
ACKERS Eric Clarkson ACKERS Hindley Wigan & Leigh HNDL/183/30

Births Mar 1912 (>99%)
Ackers Eric C Ackers Wigan 8c 182

ACKERS, ERIC CLARKSON - Order
GRO Reference: 1912 M Quarter in WIGAN Volume 08C Page 182


------------------------

This omission of surnames doesn't deal with all illegitimate births, e.g.:

Marriages Dec 1873 (>99%)
HARGREAVES William Kendal 10b 1143
>> Hesmondhalgh Mary Ann Kendal 10b 1143
>> Logan George Harold Kendal 10b 1143
WRIGHT Jane Kendal 10b 1143

Births Jun 1874 (>99%)
Logan Margaret Agnes Kendal 10b 716
Deaths Jun 1876 (>99%)
Logan Margaret Agnes 1 Kendal 10b 420

Deaths Sep 1878 (>99%)
Logan George Harold 23 Kendal 10b 411


Births Jun 1880 (>99%)
LOGAN James Edmund Kendal 10b 750

Births Jun 1882 (>99%)
Logan Edith Lewis Kendal 10b 723

LOGAN, MARGARET AGNES HESMONDHALGH Order
GRO Reference: 1874 J Quarter in KENDAL Volume 10B Page 716

LOGAN, JAMES EDMUND HESMONDHALGH Order
GRO Reference: 1880 J Quarter in KENDAL Volume 10B Page 750

LOGAN, EDITH LEWIS - Order
GRO Reference: 1882 J Quarter in KENDAL Volume 10B Page 723

The 3 GRO index lookups have the same form, but only Margret Agnes was legitimate; the latter two were illegitimate biths to the widow Logan.

As a footnote, James Edmund Logan was my dad's stepfather.


---------------------

About 3% of English marrs are between 1st cousins. and over a quarter of first cousins will share their common granpa's surname, so marrs between couples with the same last name, although not common, are not really rare.

I don't know if the following couple are related:

Lancashire Marriage indexes for the years: 1868
Surname Forename(s) Surname Forename(s) Church / Register Office Registers At Reference
GILL John GILL Jane Anne Wigan, Register Office or Registrar Attended Wigan & Leigh ROW/27/54



1881 https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:Q27G-3X1M
John Gill Head M 34 Whitchurch, Devon, England
Jane A Gill Wife F 32 Buckland Monachora, Devon, England
Emily Jane Gill Daughter F 10 Wigan, Lancashire, England
Mary Elizabeth Gill Daughter F 8 Wigan, Lancashire, England
Noah Gill Son M 6 Wigan, Lancashire, England
G J Gill Daughter F 4 Wigan, Lancashire, England
Charles Gill Son M 2 Wigan, Lancashire, England


Lancashire Birth indexes for the years:
Surname Forename(s) Mother's Maiden Name Sub-District Registers At Reference
1870 GILL Emeley Jane GILL Pemberton Wigan & Leigh PEM/27/388
1872 GILL Mary Elizabeth GILL Pemberton Wigan & Leigh PEM/30/343
1874 GILL Noah GILL Wigan Wigan & Leigh WIG/110/8
1876 GILL Georgina GILL Wigan Wigan & Leigh WIG/118/38
1878 GILL Charles GILL Wigan Wigan & Leigh WIG/126/457


Births Sep 1870 (>99%)
GILL Emeley Jane Wigan 8c 95

GILL, EMELEY JANE GILL Order
GRO Reference: 1870 S Quarter in WIGAN Volume 08C Page 95


Births Dec 1872 (>99%)
GILL Mary Elizabeth Wigan 8c 117

GILL, MARY ELIZABETH GILL Order
GRO Reference: 1872 D Quarter in WIGAN Volume 08C Page 117


Births Sep 1874 (>99%)
Gill Noah Wigan 8c 60

GILL, NOAH GILL Order
GRO Reference: 1874 S Quarter in WIGAN Volume 08C Page 60


Births Sep 1876 (>99%)
GILL Georgina Wigan 8c 54

GILL, GEORGINA GILL Order
GRO Reference: 1876 S Quarter in WIGAN Volume 08C Page 54


Births Dec 1878 (>99%)
Gill Charles Wigan 8c 30

GILL, CHARLES GILL Order
GRO Reference: 1878 D Quarter in WIGAN Volume 08C Page 30


=========================

Thru 1910q2, the printed GRO index typically included one mid-name in full.
In 1910q3, they started giving just one forename, with just initials for the mid-names.
The new online index gives all the names in full, thru 1915. E.g.,

Births Jun 1912 (>99%)
Baldwin Winifred Y Thirlaway Newcastle T. 10b 289

BALDWIN, WINIFRED YOUNGER THIRLAWAY Order
GRO Reference: 1912 J Quarter in NEWCASTLE-UPON-TYNE Volume 10B Page 289

This was my aunt, and I knew she was named after her gran, so I knew the Y-name beforehand in this case,