Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
OLD RESIDENTIAL BOOKS
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Jo1015 | Report | 11 Oct 2011 17:37 |
Hi everyone, I'm desperately trying to find info about my g grandad who was estranged from the family since around 1940. I have a death certificate, died 1965 Northumberland South, but no idea where he was between 1940-1965. Is there a way of looking up people in old residential books or things similar to that? He had 8 children and none of them knew him, or even knew when he died. Been to probate office today and it looks as though he didnt make a will.Totally and utterly STUMPED. Any help appreciated! Jo :-) |
|||
|
Jo1015 | Report | 11 Oct 2011 17:51 |
If anyone is on ancestory could you please help? |
|||
|
Shirley~I,m getting the hang of it | Report | 11 Oct 2011 18:03 |
I dont think any info would be on Ancestry as its too late for census records etc. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
George_of_Westbury | Report | 11 Oct 2011 18:05 |
Wills on Ancestry only go to 1941. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Jo1015 | Report | 11 Oct 2011 18:05 |
I've had a look on ancestry and you can view residential phone directories from 1880-1984, it gives an address also. I'm a member but dont have a subscription with them so it wont let me view the results. :-\ |
|||
|
Jo1015 | Report | 11 Oct 2011 18:07 |
George- I was at the probate registry office today and it appears he didnt have a will, thanks though! |
|||
|
Shirley~I,m getting the hang of it | Report | 11 Oct 2011 18:08 |
will take a look if you give his name |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Jo1015 | Report | 11 Oct 2011 18:14 |
Well with the info I have from family it is believed he went back to his mothers house. She was Hannah E Mitchell, widowed for many years, she died in 1938. His name is James Matthew Mitchell, on most documents he just has his middle name as the initial 'M'. He lived in Wallsend, Northumberland England. The last address I have for them from the census is Atkinson Street,Wallsend, whether they stayed there for many years I'm unsure. Thanks so much, if you need any other info please ask! :-) |
|||
|
Shirley~I,m getting the hang of it | Report | 11 Oct 2011 18:22 |
Just the one shows |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Jo1015 | Report | 11 Oct 2011 18:27 |
many thanks :) |
|||
|
Shirley~I,m getting the hang of it | Report | 11 Oct 2011 18:30 |
have you got his mums death cert . he may have been the informant and it should give addresses |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Shirley~I,m getting the hang of it | Report | 11 Oct 2011 18:31 |
Those records are for people who had telephones .not everyone did in the 1940,s onwards. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Eringobragh1916 | Report | 11 Oct 2011 18:36 |
JoP.....What makes you think he was in a Residential Home...? |
|||
|
Jo1015 | Report | 11 Oct 2011 18:56 |
Eringo, to be honest I'd rather you didnt comment on my threads, as every time you do I find your way of words to be very negative. I didnt say anything about a residential home?! |
|||
|
Eringobragh1916 | Report | 11 Oct 2011 20:58 |
JoP....You state " I would rather you didnt comment on my threads etc" |
|||
|
Sorcha | Report | 11 Oct 2011 21:49 |
JOP |
|||
|
Jo1015 | Report | 12 Oct 2011 10:25 |
Your last post eringo has proved my point. Its the attitude you put across. I havent long been a member of this and yes i have thanked you for your help, as i have everyone, but i find many of your responses undermining and quite intimidating - speaking as a relatively new user. Just being honest. Sorry if you dont like that. |
|||
|
Jo1015 | Report | 12 Oct 2011 10:32 |
No one enjoys being made to feel stupid, especially when relatively new to genes reunited and family history search in general. I have thanked you for your help and that is sincere, but you have also made me feel stupid which i think is unfair. I think many would agree this whole thing can be quite intimating when first starting off, it is nice to be helpful, but please bear in mind, not all of us know the ropes as well as you do. Post away. |
|||
|
Janet | Report | 12 Oct 2011 12:43 |
Hello Joey123, I am sure that no-one intended to make anyone feel stupid but sometimes when trying to help we all have different ways of progressing. This sometimes leads us to ask questions that may appear negative but have a genuine reason for asking. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Jo1015 | Report | 12 Oct 2011 13:00 |
Thank you for your information Janet. I would like to think this, and am happy to think this to be honest as I do enjoy GR and family history and am doing it mainly for my nanna who is 77. |