Genealogy Chat

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Quick Search

Single word search

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

They don't make it easy....Update 15 August

Page 0 + 1 of 2

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. »
ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

MargaretM

MargaretM Report 15 Aug 2010 17:51

Thanks for letting us know how it ended, Chris. I'm happy that you're a "happy bunny".
Incidentally my grandma was an Everson but from the Norfolk Eversons.

Nickydownsouth

Nickydownsouth Report 15 Aug 2010 17:45

Thats really good news Chris...getting your confirmation of correct marriage.

I didn`t add to this thread back in April ,but remember reading it.

I too have been to Westminster Archives a couple of times, and yes the staff are really knowledgable and helpful.


Nicky

Chris in Sussex

Chris in Sussex Report 15 Aug 2010 14:39

Just to let everyone who got involved...

Last week I made it to the Westminster Archives and now have a copy of the original register entry for Susanna Clayton nee Everson to Scipio Robinson.

Bingo!!! The 'S' is very distinctive and an 'exact' match and likewise the end 'on' for Clayton and Everson.

As an aside I would just like to say that I did enjoy my afternoon at the Westminster Archives not least of all because of the very friendly and knowledgable staff. The only downside was that copies are £1 each as opposed to the usual 10/20p in other London Archives.

Thanks again to all those who spent time on tis back in April.

Chris <<<One happy bunny



Chris in Sussex

Chris in Sussex Report 28 Apr 2010 18:57

Margaret

Yes that is Susanna and Scipio in the 1841.

The fact she has a 'Y' in the 'Where born' column is one of the reasons why I am being over cautious for the marriage in Wales being her first marriage.

At the second marriage her father's occupation is Iron Founder....Not an occupation that I believe was common in London at that time. After some research I found that Iron Founders were very common in Wales and especially around Merthry Tydfil where the first marriage took place.

'In 1750 Merthyr Tydfil was a quiet village surrounded by green fields. Most of the forty or so families who lived in the village worked on the land. However, this situation was to change when it became known that coke could be used for smelting iron. Merthyr Tydfil, with its large supplies of both iron ore and coal, was an attractive site for the ironmasters. The first ironworks was opened in 1759. Others followed and by 1784 there were four large ironworks (Penydarren, Dowlais, Plymouth, Cyfarthfa) within a two mile radius of the original village. By 1801 over 8,000 people were living in Merthyr Tydfil making it the largest town in Wales.'

Susanna and her first husband were having children baptised in London, the first taking place 9 months after the marriage :-)

Chris

Chris in Sussex

Chris in Sussex Report 28 Apr 2010 18:36

Gwyn

Thanks for your thoughts and yes I admit I am being over careful. But I will have the 'S' from Susanna and 'on' from ClaytON (for a match with EversON) to compare....But whether that will be enough only time will tell.

I think it is a case of once bitten and twice shy... As by not checking something similar for another line years ago I ended up 'barking up' the wrong tree :-(

Chris

MargaretM

MargaretM Report 28 Apr 2010 18:30

Looking at the original of the marriage reg. I see the groom's name is actualy Scipio. On the 41 census Scipio & Susanna were living in Finsbury, St. Giles in the Fields and they both say they were born in that county. So why did Susanna marry in Wales?

Gwyn in Kent

Gwyn in Kent Report 28 Apr 2010 16:15

I'm not sure that you'd have enough signature to compare to satisy you, .... only the S.

It seems more than coincidence that you have back up information linking the 2 brides.
2 Susanna Eversons from the same area would both have to have married CLAYTON and have moved to London.

I understand your caution, but it may not be possible to confirm 100%.

Gwyn

MargaretM

MargaretM Report 28 Apr 2010 16:09

Nothing wrong with being too cautious, Chris, better than going off on the wrong track. Having said that, however, I'm sure you're on the right track if you have Susannah Everson marrying a Clayton then Susannah Clayton marrying with father's name Everson I think it's got to be the same person.

Chris in Sussex

Chris in Sussex Report 28 Apr 2010 15:03

Margaret

Sorry I didn't reply to your post at 14:41

Yes the cert does give her father as an Everson but it doesn't deffinetively confirm the Susanna marrying in Wales is the same Susanna marrying in London.

As I said I am probably being too cautious as everything else I have adds up to her being the same person but...Well that's me :-)

Thanks
Chris

Chris in Sussex

Chris in Sussex Report 28 Apr 2010 14:54

InspectorGreenPen

Yes that is exactly what I mean.... :-)

Chris

**Reply crossed...Slow typer here**

InspectorGreenPen

InspectorGreenPen Report 28 Apr 2010 14:52

From the last few posts, obviously yes.

InspectorGreenPen

InspectorGreenPen Report 28 Apr 2010 14:50

What is your definition of 'the original entry for the second marriage' ? Do you mean the Parish Register entry?

Chris in Sussex

Chris in Sussex Report 28 Apr 2010 14:50

Margaret

You won't find it as the St Martin in the Fields registers haven't been filmed, they are not at the LMA but at Westminster Archives.

Thanks for looking tho'

Chris

Chris in Sussex

Chris in Sussex Report 28 Apr 2010 14:48

PigletsPal

Sadly it is not on Ancestry, St Martins in the Fields :-(

The registers are at Westminster Archives and as long as you can give an exact date and church they will copy for £4.
So it wouldn't work if you didn't have the precise info already which I do have from the GRO copy cert.

Chris

MargaretM

MargaretM Report 28 Apr 2010 14:46

I've been searching those London Marriage Records with no luck.

MargaretM

MargaretM Report 28 Apr 2010 14:40

I was asking about her father's name on the 1838 certificate because if it was Everson that would clinch it, wouldn't it?

Chris in Sussex

Chris in Sussex Report 28 Apr 2010 14:39

Margaret

Thanks, yes that's the second marriage, Clayton to Robinson, and that is the copy cert I have from the GRO. It is the marriage I need a photocopy of the original register entry so I can compare signatures.

Chris

Chris in Sussex

Chris in Sussex Report 28 Apr 2010 14:36

Potty

Yes it is the original for the second marriage I will be obtaining from the archive. The first marriage I have a photocopy of the actual parish register entry.

Chris

MargaretM

MargaretM Report 28 Apr 2010 14:33

Is this her second marriage?

Marriages Mar 1838 (>99%)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Adams William St. Martins in the Fields 1 115
Clayton Susanna St Martin in the Fields 1 115
Felton Henry St Martin 1 115
Marpas Martha St Martin 1 115
Martyr Thomas William Lockyer St Martin 1 115
Robinson Scipic St Martin in the Fields 1 115
STAPLES Martha Ann St Martin Fields 1 115
TRAPAUD Meliora Plaietow St. Martin, Fields 1 115

Potty

Potty Report 28 Apr 2010 14:32

You would have to get a photocopy of or view the original entry in the Church register to be 100% certain that it was her signature you were seeing. The copy sent to the GRO might not have been signed by her but just be a copy made by the vicar of the original entry .