General Chat

Apology accepted as I know that anyone who saw that website would in no way shape or form defend those that had contributed to it! However Ian/Ron/IW - the only threads I ever see you post on are one's where you wish to make some comment to stir up a row, so if you don't like this thread then don't post on it, I will take it however that you do like it as you seem drawn to it - so thankyou once again for your comments My real name is Joanne Barker - and I never change form Brick Wall, it is only those that continually change or those that are suspended and come back under other names to cause trouble that give genuine members cause for concern. Is that why you didn't get suspended for the success board incident Ian/Ron/adam/IW as you change your name so often? and GR couldn't find you Joanne

It's not a thread I've ever read - looks like I'm not going to now either. :-)))

Then why does she call herself 'Mandy in Somerset'? The 'Blake' fact may well be known by you but not to newly-joined members; and then why does she take it upon herself to criticise others who have changed their name? Talk about hypocrisy!

I don't accept your apology, if that's what it was. Your sole intention was to stir up trouble. Mandy has said on many an occasion what her real name is. I'd like to know what your real name is?

Apology accepted Ian:)

Mandys real name is Mandy Blake shes never hid the fact

Apologies, if they are in order, as I have seen nothing of the website which has caused such an outcry. Thank you 'Mandy in Somerset'... is that your real name or an alias???.. for informing the general public as to my previous names. I have no problem with that as I have nothing to hide.... maybe you do which is why you use an alias? Maybe you could inform us of the real names of 90% of the contributors on here who go by aliases! Otherwise, and back on topic, this place has degenerated into a mess of 'they started it' accusations. Who has the moral highground? Maybe you do, maybe they do but why not give it a rest and stop these niggly little backstabbing threads that have become the norm on here. BTW I am not a spokesperson for any underground anti-GR movement and have not been in surreptitious pm contact with anyone!

Ian ......... don't know you from Adam matey ....but me thinks its more of case of you talking out of your bottom than us few here with twisted knickers.. .........please do frequent yourself with what has been going on behind closed doors as regards to the wonderful degenerate misfits who felt the need to start up their own website to single out mainly one person from here and a few others in the most horrible playground bullying way they could....... wave at those if you must .......... but shudder that you should want too!!

fifthed Gwynne

Fourthed ;)

3rd it! Gillie xx

I'll second that Joanne Paul

Ian/Ron - whatever, As I said it is my post and I was asking why the Mexican wave had gone. As for suspended members ( some of them ) answering for themselves - they can as you, I and everyone else here knows that they can, they have been under false names for a while now, as I said before if you wish to defend them and there behaviour please have the manners to do it elsewhere - Thankyou very much Joanne

but the whole point is that they CAN answer for themselves, they have rejoined under aliases and have been posting on here for some time.

Gwynne and Maz, I've no axe to grind. Just thought that one person's bully is another's chum. There seem to be at least two camps here who want to keep on with the gouging and scratching which is quite unnecessary; especially when one lot can't answer for themselves. Everyone, however, seems to insist on having the last word, and having a little dig in the process. To come back down to year zero; what is the point of this thread if it's not to have a dig at people? and what is the point in that, now?

Ians response has been the only negative response ive had today (I can understand why Sandra got upset though) Maybe he endorses this kind of behavior from his friends He's here to flamebait nothing more nothing less Lets ignore him as hes not worth the fight >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Read about Trolls and flamebaiting here...you will recognise a lot of people..keep it in your favourites http://members.aol(.)com/intwg/trolls.htm >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Applauds David Gillie xx

Ian Which of those suspended are unable to take part? Have any of them not rejoined? That's a genuine question I don't know the answer to. I'm sorry you feel that people are getting het up over nothing but I've seen the viciousness and bullying that was posted on another website about Elaine. If you think the members who were suspended for breaking the GR rules (which we all know happens however silly we might think the rules) have been harder done to than Elaine, I'm chuffed I don't know you.

Ian Thank you for your comments, however I think you may not have read the posts regarding some of those who have been suspended (not all of them I may add ) and the hurtful website they produced in order to humiliate and case defamation of character to others, if you can defend that sort of behaviour then that is your right, and I therfore hope will appreciate our right to stand together and say that the hurtful remarks and postings they have done under false names is disgusting beyond belief. I would request that if you wish to defend those rseponsible then you do so on your own thread. This thread was put there by myself to enquire as to why if nothing wrong had been done by the minority of the suspended members was the mexican wave deleted? Regards Joanne

*slaps self for getting sucked in by a troll*