General Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Should the time limit for terminations be reduced?
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
TaniaNZ | Report | 21 May 2008 12:22 |
Well I am glad |
|||
|
Muffyxx | Report | 21 May 2008 12:18 |
I'm just wondering whether this will have a knock on effect for prem babies?. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Roxanne | Report | 21 May 2008 11:02 |
I dont think many people would disagree that there are certain circumstances when it should be allowed just 2 In my opinion. |
|||
|
DAVE B | Report | 21 May 2008 10:52 |
Agreed Muffy like I said earlier, sometimes it is needed for health reasons. |
|||
|
Muffyxx | Report | 21 May 2008 10:50 |
Dave the big problem with finding out whether your baby has any abnormalities is that the major scan is at 20 weeks. Once they've further investigated and double checked that they are correct often the pregnancy is another 2-3 weeks along. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Roxanne | Report | 21 May 2008 10:28 |
Well,It being kept at 24 weeks:-(( so Ive just heard. |
|||
|
DAVE B | Report | 21 May 2008 10:25 |
As a Catholic, basically I am anti abortion, but I realise sometimes it is very needed.It probaly sounds mad for a man to say this, But surely in these days of technology and medical science, that by 20 weeks a woman should know whether her baby is going to be disabled? Or whether she wants to keep it? |
|||
|
°o.O(¯`·._.·Frankie·._.·´¯)O.o° | Report | 20 May 2008 22:16 |
I think it should be reduced to 20 weeks (although 18 would be better) except for when a doctor thinks the circumstances are exceptional enough |
|||
|
Jessie aka Maddies mate | Report | 20 May 2008 22:15 |
I think it should be reduced to 20 weeks if it is not for medical reasons. |
|||
|
Shelli4 | Report | 20 May 2008 22:13 |
two people quoted the morning after pill, remember that isn't 100% - trust me I know and he'll be 10 in September!!!! |
|||
|
donna | Report | 20 May 2008 22:06 |
i dont think abortions should be allowed so late on. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Gypsy | Report | 20 May 2008 21:24 |
Yes I think it should be lowered. |
|||
|
TinaElizabeth | Report | 20 May 2008 17:26 |
Some one said at 20 wks its fully formed, which they are of course right. It got me thinking that my friends daughter who lost a baby at 16 wks.She had a picture of her son and although he was very red he too was fully formed not like a full term baby in colour but apart from that he was fully formed so maybe it should be even lower. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Roxanne | Report | 20 May 2008 16:09 |
I do think that if the mothers life is in danger or if the child has got severe deformities then it should be allowed. |
|||
|
♫ Penny € | Report | 20 May 2008 16:08 |
Here are some stats from the BBC website |
|||
|
Teddys Girl | Report | 20 May 2008 16:01 |
Your right Gwyn, |
|||
|
Gwyn in Kent | Report | 20 May 2008 15:56 |
From the NHS site........ |
|||
|
covlass | Report | 20 May 2008 15:46 |
I think it should be reduced to 16 weeks unless its advised on medical grounds. I had a complications with my 2nd child & had to have regular scans I remember 1 scan at 21 weeks seeing my baby tiny but formed, my daughter was born premature & survived. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Teddys Girl | Report | 20 May 2008 15:39 |
I would not like to go back to the back street abortions, as film Vera Drake. but I do think that in this day of contraception being easy, there are too many abortions. |
|||
|
CMD | Report | 20 May 2008 15:14 |
I do not agree with abortions, |