Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Royal Navy
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
ChrisofWessex | Report | 6 Jan 2008 02:34 |
What roughly would have been the wages for a stoker in 1902 - I ask as have come across one who has 7 days to pay £47 into court! I am guessing that this was 9 - 12 mths wage but do not know. |
|||
|
Staffs Col | Report | 6 Jan 2008 08:56 |
I don't have figues for 1902 but in 1920 the daily rates of pay for a Royal Navy Stoker varied between 3 shillings 3d and 6 shillings per diem (per day) depending on the class and period of service of the sailor so bearing in mind 1912 rates of pay would have been rather lower the £47 fine would have been very hefty especially given the 7 day deadline. As a guideline the average annual wage in England in 1912 was just over £97 |
|||
|
InspectorGreenPen | Report | 6 Jan 2008 11:21 |
Adjusted for the Retail Price Index, £47 in 1902 is the equivalent of more than £3,500 today. |
|||
|
ChrisofWessex | Report | 6 Jan 2008 11:50 |
Thank you both for info - the figure was actually £47.12s.3d. being the full costs incurred by the plaintiff in a divorce case! Our stoker was the co-respondent - wonder how he paid it - the RN would not have made him a loan - or did he go to prison for non-payment? Even if he managed to pay the costs - would he have been discharged from the RN? |
|||
|
TiddlyBow | Report | 6 Jan 2008 14:25 |
Chris. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Staffs Col | Report | 6 Jan 2008 15:02 |
Its 1912 we are looking for not 1902 Chris...do you have those figures as the nearest I have is 1920. col |
|||
|
ChrisofWessex | Report | 6 Jan 2008 19:28 |
Looks as if a guessed rate of pay in 1902 would have been £1 then - or not far off! |