Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
What does this mean?
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Margaret | Report | 28 Nov 2007 19:12 |
I have the Baptismal records of 8 children born to the same parents but only one of them states 'Received into the Church'. |
|||
|
Potty | Report | 28 Nov 2007 19:20 |
Are these submitted records from the IGI? If so, treat them with suspicion - submitted records are often wildly inaccurate. They have been entered by members of the LDS who have the duty to trace their family back a few generations and a lot of the entries are probably just made up. |
|||
|
Margaret | Report | 28 Nov 2007 19:24 |
No, these have been taken from the Record Office. |
|||
|
was plain ann now annielaurie | Report | 28 Nov 2007 19:26 |
P.B. would probably be Private Baptism, which means they were baptised at home. Often this was for children too ill to attend church. Received into the Church was often a separate ceremony after a baptism. |
|||
|
Margaret | Report | 28 Nov 2007 19:35 |
Thankyou Ann, that makes sense, as one of the children died quite soon after birth, hopefully the other survived. |
|||
|
Margaret | Report | 28 Nov 2007 19:41 |
The other child was P.B. Sept. 1819 then 'received into the Church' March 1820. Could it be that he wasn't expected to live but survived? |
|||
|
was plain ann now annielaurie | Report | 28 Nov 2007 19:53 |
Could be, but could also be baptised after death. |
|||
|
Ajwyorks | Report | 28 Nov 2007 20:06 |
In the past children were expected to be taken to church to be baptised in a public ceremony before the congregation. The service welcomed them into the family of the church (still does). If a child was not expected to survive they could have a private baptism which took place very shortly after birth but then if and when they were well enough they were taken to church to be received into the family of the church. They were never baptised after death. |
|||
|
was plain ann now annielaurie | Report | 28 Nov 2007 20:15 |
Andy |
|||
|
Margaret | Report | 28 Nov 2007 21:01 |
Ann, I've never heard of anyone being Baptised after Death. Certainly not 6 months after! |
|||
|
Judith | Report | 28 Nov 2007 21:09 |
The mormon church baptise after death, Church of England do not. Private baptism followed by a service during which the child is received into the church is a Church of England service. If you have a copy of the Book of Common Prayer in the house - and I bet lots of you had one as a christening present even if you never open it - take a look, the services, and the circumstances when they might be used, are set out in there. |
|||
|
was plain ann now annielaurie | Report | 28 Nov 2007 21:23 |
Margaret |
|||
|
Margaret | Report | 28 Nov 2007 21:39 |
Baptism is a Holy Sacrament that can only be received ONCE. |
|||
|
Sue in Somerset | Report | 29 Nov 2007 00:00 |
For Church of England records these definitely mean privately baptised then received into the church if the child survived. |
|||
|
Gwyn in Kent | Report | 29 Nov 2007 10:50 |
I agree with Ann., - I too have seen a record in the registers, (C of E in Sussex) where a child was baptised after death. |
|||
|
Abigail | Report | 29 Nov 2007 12:04 |
Private baptisms took place at home or in the church but seperately from everyone else's. It seems they were chosen as a matter of preference by some couples, given the high infant mortality rates you would expect to see more of these if illness/sickness was the major reason. |
|||
|
♥Deetortrainingnewfys♥ | Report | 29 Nov 2007 12:32 |
I have an ancester who had a PB (private Baptism) on 5/4/1855 age 5wks which was recorded into the parish records and showed he was born in March 1855. |
|||
|
was plain ann now annielaurie | Report | 29 Nov 2007 16:43 |
Thank you Gwyneth! Pleased someobody agrees with me - I was made to feel a bit stupid, although I knew I was right! |
|||
|
Margaret | Report | 29 Nov 2007 16:45 |
Thankyou all for your replies. |
|||
|
Huia | Report | 29 Nov 2007 19:39 |
Hoobityboobity, whatever happened to 'Suffer little children to come unto me and forbid them not for of such is the kingdom of heaven'? I wouldnt want to have anything to do with a church which had forgotten those words. |
|||
Researching: |