Genealogy Chat

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Quick Search

Single word search

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

Vaccinations in the 1800s

ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

maggiewinchester

maggiewinchester Report 19 Nov 2007 22:53

Thanks for that, Pauline, it sounds barbaric!!
I wonder how much hepatitis was spread as well.

maggie

Chica in the sun ☼

Chica in the sun ☼ Report 19 Nov 2007 22:43

Thank you Pauline for that info. Makes me shudder to think of compulsory vaccination, especially as many children were malnourished at the time. Interesting info though.

POSITIVE Pauline

POSITIVE Pauline Report 19 Nov 2007 19:20

I have had this info sent to me which I didn't know about.

"The Vaccination Act of 1840 stipulated that free vaccination against smallpox should be available as a charge on the poor rates. However, it was not until the Vaccination Act of 1853 that vaccination was made compulsory and it became the responsibility of the poor law guardians to make sure that all infants were vaccinated within four months of birth. However, the guardians were not given any powers of enforcement and had no means of ensuring that all children were vaccinated. In 1867, they were given the right to prosecute parents for non-compliance; parents could be fined and even sent to prison if the fines were not paid. Guardians were required to keep registers of vaccinations. In 1871, they were also obliged to appoint vaccination officers for their union. Their task was made easier in 1874 when birth registration was made compulsory, with the onus being put on parents to have the births of their children recorded. Following the 1867 Act, objections to vaccination increased, with many parents preferring to go to prison rather than have their children’s health compromised. The procedure was dangerous by modern standards because the child’s arm was scored with a lancet and viral material rubbed into the wound. A child who developed vesicles in the skin would be used to provide vaccine material for other children. This meant that vaccinated children could fall victim to infections in the vaccination wound and to diseases carried in the blood of the donor child. Parents also feared that the introduction of cow’s lymph or pauper’s lymph into their child’s blood could make the child cow-like or degenerate. In 1898, a new Vaccination Act introduced a conscientious objection clause which meant that parents could obtain a certificate from the magistrates exempting their child from vaccination, although by this time it was clear that the incidence of small-pox was decreasing due to the implementation of the vaccination scheme.

The registrar extracted the entry from the birth register for each child and the vaccination officer completed the entry with the date of the certificate of successful vaccination. The births were written on forms with five births to a page. Information given is the child’s name, date and place of birth, father’s name and occupation (mother’s if the child was illegitimate) and the date of the vaccination certificate or the date of death if the child died in infancy."

Pauline
xx