Genealogy Chat

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Quick Search

Single word search

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

Which do I look for?

Page 1 + 1 of 2

  1. «
  2. 1
  3. 2
ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

♥Athena

♥Athena Report 8 Nov 2007 15:39

Dee - just noticed on the marriage entries that William and Ellen married in Cleobury Mortimer - the same place that you have the 8yr old William residing on the 1861 census. Could just be coincidence but it may well be the same person.

Athena

♥Deetortrainingnewfys♥

♥Deetortrainingnewfys♥ Report 8 Nov 2007 15:38

On 1861 I think I have him as age 8 (B1853) at Dunval Cottage, Broseley Rd, Astley Abbotts, Cleobury Mortimer.

♥Deetortrainingnewfys♥

♥Deetortrainingnewfys♥ Report 8 Nov 2007 15:35

Sorry Reggie thats my fault, I didn't make it clear

In 1891 the couple were at milletts, Neenton, Bridgnorth, Salop.

In 1901 they had moved to 24 Coven St, Wolverhampton.

I think I have William age 23 as a Farmers servant indoors at Farlow Shropshire on the 1881 census but cannot be certain due to the age differences.

1901 = 45 (B1856)
1891 = 35 (B1856)
1881 = 23 (B1858) (which would just about tie in with his age of 28 on 21st Feb 1887 when he married Ellen Lloyd).

♥Athena

♥Athena Report 8 Nov 2007 15:35

I'm having same prob as Reg - could you give us the census info for 1891/1901 please, Dee - or any clue as to whether they were mistranscribed.

It's useful for us to be able to see all the info you have so that we can make a more informed decision re your queries and it'll help us with our searches.

Thanks - Athena

ErikaH

ErikaH Report 8 Nov 2007 15:28

My eyes must be playing tricks.....I can't see hide nor hair of them in 1891 or 1901.

Reg

♥Deetortrainingnewfys♥

♥Deetortrainingnewfys♥ Report 8 Nov 2007 15:23

Hi Reggie

It just says Labourer

ErikaH

ErikaH Report 8 Nov 2007 15:20

As birth registration wasn't compulsory until 1875, his birth may not have been registered..........

What did the marriage cert say about his father's occupation?

Reg

♥Deetortrainingnewfys♥

♥Deetortrainingnewfys♥ Report 8 Nov 2007 15:12

I have my Gt grandfather William Palmer married to Ellen Lloyd in 1887 (I have the cert). He is 28 and she is 24 therefore, it is estimated that he should be born in 1859 and she in 1863.

On the 1901 census, he is shown as 45 and 35 on the 1891. She is 40 and 28 respectively. This means that he was born in 1856 and she 1861/63.

Now some very kind GR members traced william in Astley Abbotts, Cleobury Mortimer, Shropshire on the 1861 census age 8 (therefore born 1853). He is living with his mother Ann Howells and stepfather William Howells, Thomas Howells and Elisha Howells. Is this the correct one?

On the marriage cert it states his father as William Palmer also and he was living in Aston Botterell, Shropshire.

Now, my next stage is to find his birth. But there are several William Palmers in Shropshire, 1 in 1852 Cleobury Mortimer, 1 in 1852 Ludlow, 1 in 1852 in Tenbury, 1 in 1854 Wellington, Salop, 1 in 1859 Shrewsbury, 1 in 1859 Market Drayton and 1 in 1860 Whitchurch.

Which one do I go for? Giving that I have his birth between 1853 and 1859?

I have looked for Ann & William Snr on an 1851 cenus, but the ages do not match up with that of Ann Howells on the 1861 census. (Ann was married to william Howells Mar 1/4 1859 Bridgnorth).

Could anyone give me advice as to what I should do now?

many thanks
Dee