Genealogy Chat

Thank you all for your detective work!

Regards Terri

Is this how his name is transcribed in 1861, with a wife called Anne?
John Bartlett Shanebrook

.... snap, Jim.

1871
John B Shanebrook Ann abt 1831 Ratcliff, Middlesex, England Head St Anne Limehouse London

1861
John Bartlett Shanebrook Anne abt 1831 St Georges East, Middlesex, England Head Stepney St Dunstan Middlesex
1841
John Shanbrack abt 1832 Surrey, England St George The Martyr Surrey
1881
John Shambrook Ann abt 1831 St George, Middlesex, England Head Linchouse London

1841 but need a look at the image

Name: John Shanbrack
Age: 9
Estimated Birth Year: abt 1832
Gender: Male
Where born: Surrey, England

Civil Parish: St George The Martyr
Hundred: Southwark
County/Island: Surrey
Country: England

Street address:

Occupation: View Image

Registration district: St George Southwark
Sub-registration district: Borough Road
Neighbors: View others on page
Household Members: Name Age
Ann Shanbrack 30
John Shanbrack 9

Source Citation: Class: HO107; Piece 1084; Book: 5; Civil Parish: St George The Martyr; County: Surrey; Enumeration District: 9; Folio: 9; Page: 9; Line: 3; GSU roll: 474668.


Could be Shambrock ?
Ann listed as Ind - Independent means

Is this your John in 1881?

Birth Year 1831
Birthplace St George, Middlesex, England
Age 50
Occupation Driller (E/M Sink)
Marital Status M
Head of Household John SHAMBROOK


http://www.familysearch.org

Forgot to mention I am looking for the Shambrook's on the 1841 and 1851 census - have found them on later ones.

Terri

Many thanks to you all for your replies.

Now there is a chance of finding relatives on other sites I will give it a try. I wasn't sure if they were all transcribed by the same source, and if that were the case there would be no point in looking further.

Thanks once again. Terri

That was quick!!

If you can help I would be most grateful, I am looking for

John Bartlett Shambrook christened 1831 Stepney & his father James Shambrook - mother not known.

On John Bartlett Shambrooks's married certificate 1857 it states father James as a Nut Merchant

But Rose, they are all taken from the same record source, the original census records. The fact is though that sometimes you can find someone on one set that you have failed to find on another. I often use 1881 on familysearch rather than ancestry because it seems better transcribed. I know a lot of people like to double check for missing people on find my past.

not all the census are the same source some are ancestry there is roots.uk and others all with diffrent info some are transcibe and are still be done

Well they are all from the same source but sometimes things do get badly mistranscribed on one which then turns up on another.

Who is it you are looking for?

Can anyone tell me if the census found on the net are all from the same source. In other words relatives I am not able to find on one site may I find on another?