Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
'Occupier' on Birth Cert.
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Just Jo | Report | 6 Oct 2007 22:08 |
I have a birth cert 4a 734, a maybe for OHs grandfather William George Smith b. 1/6/1871 Blundeston, but I'm not sure it "fits". |
|||
|
KathleenBell | Report | 6 Oct 2007 22:10 |
I should think it means the person who owns or is in charge of the address. Maybe your relative rented the house or rented rooms from this person. |
|||
|
MrsBucketBouquet | Report | 6 Oct 2007 22:14 |
Jo |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Just Jo | Report | 6 Oct 2007 22:18 |
Thanks Kath, |
|||
|
KathleenBell | Report | 6 Oct 2007 22:18 |
You DO have an informant on a birth certificate. It is usually one of the parents but it can be someone else. |
|||
|
Just Jo | Report | 6 Oct 2007 22:25 |
Thanks all. Yes is is a birth cert. The mother is Harriet Smith but there is no father mentioned. Presumably Naomi was a relation but I've not really pinned her down either. |
|||
|
KathleenBell | Report | 6 Oct 2007 22:30 |
If there is no mention of a father on the birth certificate, then I would suspect that the father on the marriage certificate is either a grandfather, other male relative, or just a name made up to look a bit more respectable in front of the in-laws. |
|||
|
Just Jo | Report | 6 Oct 2007 22:46 |
Thanks Kath |
|||
|
KathleenBell | Report | 6 Oct 2007 22:54 |
Have had a look at the same family on the 1861 census and the mother's name is definitely Naomi. |
|||
|
Just Jo | Report | 6 Oct 2007 23:13 |
Thanks again. I feel we may be getting somewhere Harriet's baby was obviously given second name after her father but I wonder where William comes from? And Joseph? I'm still intrigued about him. |