Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
census conflict.
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Belle56 | Report | 7 Nov 2003 13:19 |
Can any kind soul do a look up for me on the 1891 census, i am looking for Thomas and Sarah Lane both born in Middlesex London and married around 1880. On the 1901 census the are living at 38 Runham Street, Walworth and have 8 childern, this address cannot be found on the 1901 address search? and i have found a William Thomas Lane married to Sarah, both born in Middlesex and have 2 childern in 1881 Mary aged 2 (not named in 1901) and Helen aged a few months, this transcribes as Ellen in 1901, if any one could find them in 1891 i might finally know if he is William Thomas or just Thomas, just to say that both occupations match. Any information will be greatfully recieved. April:-) |
|||
|
Emma | Report | 7 Nov 2003 13:55 |
Hi April, Found the family in 1891 at: 2 Abbey Place RG12/391, ED2, folio 39, page 36 Lambeth, London William T Lane, head, mar, 36, cabman, London City Sarah J Lane, wife, mar, 32, London City Mary E Lane, daur, 12, Lambeth Ellen Lane, daur, 10, Lambeth Annie G Lane, daur, 8, Lambeth William T Lane, son, 6, Lambeth John Lane, son, 5, Lambeth Frederick Lane, son, 1 or 4, Lambeth Emma. |
|||
|
Belle56 | Report | 7 Nov 2003 14:09 |
Many thanks Lucy and Rosemary, that's my family, i wish they would stick to one name, but i suppose it makes life interesting, i'll have to phone mum now and ask if she remembers aunt Mary, she was possibly married by then. Many Thanks Again. April:-) |
|||
|
Belle56 | Report | 7 Nov 2003 14:13 |
P.S. just noticed middle names, they don't show up on 1881 or 1901. I wonder what confusion the next census will bring > Lol. April. |