Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
which do you think is correct? Please
| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown | Report | 20 Dec 2004 13:13 |
|
His death cert if you can find it would give an approximate age. His birth cert would clinch it though. Haverhill is in Risbridge registration district, but sadly the births of William Pooles there on Ancestry Civil Reg aren't old enough! nell |
|||
|
Margaretfinch | Report | 20 Dec 2004 12:04 |
|
Hi to you all thankyou for answering I have looked at the orginal census and it says 44 he had died by the 1891 census and canit find him on any other census his name William Poole says his born Haverhill Suffolk and that is where he married thankyou Margaret |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Guinevere | Report | 20 Dec 2004 09:08 |
|
Hi, Have you looked at the original census page in the 1881? There are a lot of mistranscriptions. Gwynne |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Poolie Girl | Report | 20 Dec 2004 08:57 |
|
How old is he on 1891 census? |
|||
|
Margaretfinch | Report | 20 Dec 2004 08:54 |
|
Hi I have a man on a marriage certificate in 1871 which clearly says he his 24 yet 10 years later on the 1881 census it says he is 44 and if his marriage is correct he should be 34, in a tizz and knowing which to beleive thankyou Margaret |
|||
Researching: |
|||