Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Register office ?
| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
GillfromStaffs | Report | 11 Dec 2005 18:41 |
|
O Helen iam really confused now, why o why do they all have to be Enoch and Elizabeth. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Kate | Report | 11 Dec 2005 18:44 |
|
Perhaps all the Enochs were named after an Enoch Shenton who was their grandfather or something, and as for Elizabeth, there are loads of them. Confusing, though, isn't it? Kate. |
|||
|
Historyman | Report | 11 Dec 2005 18:47 |
|
Hi Gill, Trying to cover all possibilities have you eliminated JOHN THOMAS SHENTON born Prescot (Lancs.) March 1864 8b 616 I know it is a long shot, but it is a small needle in the haystack! Regards, Ray Whincup |
|||
|
GillfromStaffs | Report | 11 Dec 2005 18:47 |
|
Helen, i think the FHS is the only way to go. Can't understand why she would have Henry baptised and registered and not John Thomas. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
GillfromStaffs | Report | 11 Dec 2005 18:50 |
|
Yes Raymond thak you he was one of the first, and one of many. lol |
|||
Researching: |
|||