Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Opinion please about 1837 online
| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Andrea | Report | 11 Mar 2006 13:50 |
|
Are you sure your dates are right? I found a Henry Edward Smith in 1873 Hastigs and when I free bmd'd it there was a Susannah Jarvis-is that his 2nd wife? I'm just going for a butty I'm starving! |
|||
|
No Longer Available | Report | 11 Mar 2006 13:58 |
|
Andrea I think you have found the marriage.!!I found an Agnes susannah Jarvis Born 1850 Waldron.I think she may have not used her 1st name.Clever you!!!! |
|||
|
Andrea | Report | 11 Mar 2006 14:05 |
|
So,he did still marry a Susannah later? |
|||
|
No Longer Available | Report | 11 Mar 2006 14:06 |
|
Andrea I have been looking for months for myggreat Aunt Katherina Gregory.No marriage nothing.Inever thought of looking at the census for a mistranscription.Her name wasn't Katherina.It was Rechabina.I found a marriage but on the census she was Emily.It took me ages to sort it out!!I am just going to prepare dinner.Takes longer to prepare than to cook!! |
|||
|
Andrea | Report | 11 Mar 2006 14:10 |
|
With illiteracy,misspelling ,middle names used and mistranscription it's a wonder we ever find anyone!! Enjoy your dinner! |
|||
|
John | Report | 11 Mar 2006 16:57 |
|
I tried a comparison on 1861 census. Ancestry gave me 12 names, 1837 gave me 106 and they were all different same with 1891 census.Ancestry 9 names 1837 24 names..I cant understand why they are so different.These were free searches. |
|||