Genealogy Chat

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Quick Search

Single word search

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

Data Protection gone stupid- FURTHER UPDATE

Page 1 + 1 of 2

  1. «
  2. 1
  3. 2
ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

InspectorGreenPen

InspectorGreenPen Report 16 Jun 2006 18:30

I makes my blood boil when organisations try to hide behind 'the law' in this way. This is from the Govt DPA Website The Data Protection Act 1998 sets out eight rules that data controllers must follow for protecting personal information - these are known as the eight principles. Personal data must be: * processed fairly and lawfully * processed only for one or more specified and lawful purpose * adequate, relevant and not excessive for those purposes * accurate and kept up to date - data subjects have the right to have inaccurate personal data corrected or destroyed if the personal information is inaccurate to any matter of fact * kept for no longer than is necessary for the purposes it is being processed * processed in line with the rights of individuals - this includes the right to be informed of all the information held about them, to prevent processing of their personal information for marketing purposes, and to compensation if they can prove they have been damaged by a data controller's non-compliance with the Act * secured against accidental loss, destruction or damage and against unauthorised or unlawful processing - this applies to you even if your business uses a third party to process personal information on your behalf * not transferred to countries outside the European Economic Area - the EU plus Norway, Iceland and Liechtenstein - that do not have adequate protection for individual's personal information, unless a condition from Schedule four of the Act can be met Please note there is no direct mention of confidentiality, not the ridiculous one of only being able to look at information it for ten minute. Rant over

Linda

Linda Report 16 Jun 2006 20:47

In Newcastle upon Tyne all 'old' (I have not looked at post 2002 ones) are available to view but there is a notice saying due to recent legislation they cannot be photocopied. Recently one was able to opt out of having ones name on rolls that are distributed and I think all libraries now restrict access to the modern ones. The legislation came in after the Data Protection Act but it was cos this person objected to councils selling his details to direct mail compnies so now one can opt out of this. I have just been to the staffordshire.gov.uk site they referred you to and it confirms that you and I are correct. However it does depend what they mean by full supervision. It also gives someone to complain to. Dated 1921 to 2001 can be consulted only with full supervision cannot be photocopied or scanned into a PC can be copied by means of handwritten notes, not onto PCs can be copied for official purposes only by written permission from the relevant Electoral Registration Officer Dated 2002 and after (compiled 10/10/01, and coming into force February 2002) are now published in edited and full versions. Inclusion in the Full Register is compulsory by law. Inclusion in the edited version is optional are provided in local town/borough/district council offices for public consultation (Full Electoral Registers ONLY) can be bought by anyone for any purpose (edited versions ONLY) must be closely supervised at all times. cannot be photocopied or scanned into a PC can be copied by means of handwritten notes, not onto PCs can be used to confirm or deny that a specific individual lives at a specific address. The caller (whether a member of the public, or a financial institution) must give us the correct address and surname that they wish to verify. If they are unable to do this, they must consult the Register in person. Full Electoral Registers… are provided for public consultation and inspection so that: people can check that their own details are correctly listed, so that - if they are eligible - they can legally vote. Identification is not required. people can verify that the details of other people are correctly listed and that they are entitled to vote e.g. if they believe that someone has been included in the Register who is not legally entitled to vote, they can then report this to the Electoral Registration Officer people involved in the democratic and electoral process (e.g. to assist MPs, MEPs, candidates, elected mayors, and political parties etc.) can carry out their duties banks and credit agencies can make checks to verify individuals' details, under the 1993 Money Laundering Regulations law enforcement, security, and crime prevention bodies can meet their statutory obligations Legislation: Representation of the People Act 2000 Section 9 Statutory Instrument 2002 no 1871 http://www.legislation.hmso.gov.uk/si/si2002/20021871.htm Please refer any complainants to the Electoral Registration Officer at the Town, Borough or District Council.

An Olde Crone

An Olde Crone Report 16 Jun 2006 20:57

What makes me (hollowly) laugh, is that I was told that the person took his case to the Human Rights Court. He had defaulted on his mortgage, had deliberately run up thousands of pounds on his crefit cards etc and then done a runner. The Mortgage Company traced him through the Electoral Rolls - and got their legs smacked by the Court of Human Rights. Olde Crone

Michael

Michael Report 16 Jun 2006 21:10

I was in Folkestone library a couple of months ago, and all the electoral rolls from 1975 backwards are freely available to look at in the Heritage Room. I started to photocopy the pages I wanted for each specific year, and the librarian came over and stopped me. She went away, phoned someone up to clarify the law, and then told me I could only photocopy up to three pages from each register. I didn't want that many anyway, and it's not as if they stood over me to check what I was doing, but the system seems very unusual and dependant on the whims of each individual library. Manchester Library have most of their registers on microform into the 1960s at least, and you can get print-outs there with no problem at all from the self-service printer machine. If your library say you can't take photocopies, then they are lying.

Mandy in Wiltshire

Mandy in Wiltshire Report 16 Jun 2006 21:22

What's with the 'ten minutes'? I'm sure that's not mentioned in the Data Protection Act! What if you're a really quick reader with a photographic memory - you could memorise a whole street in the time it takes a slow reader to find the right page number. I have the edited version of the last few electoral rolls on disc, all perfectly legal, bought from the legitimate online company that produces them (192(.)com). Am I only allowed to do lookups for 10 minutes at a time? Mandy :)