Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Was it likely for a couple to be childless all the
| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Carol | Report | 27 Jun 2006 04:49 |
|
Thank you for that Germaine Of course, there was no IVF then and if they were unable to have children they would have just gone without. |
|||
|
Germaine | Report | 27 Jun 2006 04:45 |
|
I should think so Carol. I have a couple though earlier than your never any children from early 1800's till they died in the 1880's except for a nephew who lived with them in 51and then as they got old they with him. I suppose they couldn't have children unless they had them and they died between census, but i haven't come across any. Germaine x |
|||
|
Carol | Report | 27 Jun 2006 04:13 |
|
I have a couple married in 1879. I have them on the 1881, 1891 and 1901 census with apparently no children. Not likely to be any after 1901 as wife was 49 by then and she died in 1913 |
|||