Genealogy Chat

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Boards

Quick Search

Single word search

Tools

Findmypast DNA Banner

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

Small help required please.

Login to Add Reply Watch This
ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

WhiffingSiggs

WhiffingSiggs Report 15 Feb 2012 12:21

Single women were typically referred to as spinster.. but I agree, it does seem to be the most logical answer.

Researching:
Siggs of Suffolk, Cambridgeshire, Essex and West London, Wise of North Hampshire, Wiltshire and North London and Aubrey/Whiting of South Wales/Herefordshire.

SylviaInCanada

SylviaInCanada Report 15 Feb 2012 04:53

here is the record Kevin is talking about ..... from ancestry


Suffolk, England, Extracted Parish Records about Mathew Siggs Elizh Baynes

Text: Mathew Siggs, of Haverhill, 22 years, w., & Elizh Baynes, of same, s. w., at same. 02 Oct 1775.
Book: 12.The Hearth Tax. Charles 2nd.
Collection: Suffolk: Sudbury - Marriage Licences, 1755-1781




I think, as did Kath, that w. = widower and s.w. = single woman.



sylvia

Researching:
My brother, photo taken in September 1991 just a couple of weeks before he died. ............................................................ To help us and to get better results, please post as much detail as you can, especially name, date(s) and place. Also say what you already know.

WhiffingSiggs

WhiffingSiggs Report 14 Feb 2012 21:32

Thank you :-)

Researching:
Siggs of Suffolk, Cambridgeshire, Essex and West London, Wise of North Hampshire, Wiltshire and North London and Aubrey/Whiting of South Wales/Herefordshire.

KathleenBell

KathleenBell Report 14 Feb 2012 21:29

Nothing wrong with marrying at age 16. In those days a girl could marry at 12 and a boy at 14.

He would have needed parental consent to marry at 16. However once a minor had been married and widowed there was no need for consent for a second marriage that took place before the age of 21.

Kath. x

WhiffingSiggs

WhiffingSiggs Report 14 Feb 2012 21:27

Apparently it is extracted from Parish records of Suffolk. I'm trying to determine if this is his second marriage. His first would have been 1769 which according to this would have made him 16 years old... The wife of the the '69 marriage did indeed die in '71.

Researching:
Siggs of Suffolk, Cambridgeshire, Essex and West London, Wise of North Hampshire, Wiltshire and North London and Aubrey/Whiting of South Wales/Herefordshire.

KathleenBell

KathleenBell Report 14 Feb 2012 21:17

Just a guess - w. could be widower. s.w. could be single woman. It depends on what document you found these abbreviations.

Kath. x

WhiffingSiggs

WhiffingSiggs Report 14 Feb 2012 21:13

Mathew Siggs, of Haverhill, 22 years, w., & Elizh Baynes, of same, s. w., at same. 02 Oct 1775.

can anyone tell me what the w. means?
and: s. w.

Ta :-)

edit, would there have been conditions attached to marrying at 16 years old? ie a special licence or something ?

Researching:
Siggs of Suffolk, Cambridgeshire, Essex and West London, Wise of North Hampshire, Wiltshire and North London and Aubrey/Whiting of South Wales/Herefordshire.