Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Re: 1911 census and address.
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Barbara | Report | 3 Nov 2011 09:46 |
One of my ancestors lived 8 Back Row Cranford Lane Heston. On putting in Cranford Middlesex in address to be searched it comes up with all numbers apart from no 8. Also, does anyone know how to find this address now, obviously the buildings have been knocked down, I find this on many of my address' can't seem to find them in the present day! |
|||
|
patchem | Report | 3 Nov 2011 10:05 |
The numbers change through the years so what was 8 could be completely different. |
|||
|
Barbara | Report | 3 Nov 2011 10:26 |
Hi Patchem, yes Cranford Lane is still there but 8 Back Row isn't on the 1911 census the numbers jump from 6,7 and then to 9 and 10 Back Row. Was wondering where Back Row was in Cranford Lane, is there anyway of finding out? |
|||
|
Mary | Report | 3 Nov 2011 14:30 |
When you view No 7 Edward Timberlake and No 9 Mary A Church go to the list and it shows No 8 as unoccupied. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Barbara | Report | 3 Nov 2011 14:47 |
Thank you so much Mary. Will PM my email address. |
|||
|
Mary | Report | 3 Nov 2011 15:02 |
Hope you got it ok Barbara. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Barbara | Report | 3 Nov 2011 15:09 |
Thank you Mary, I received it. |