Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Bigamy
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Sheila | Report | 17 Apr 2011 17:55 |
I have a couple who married twice. The first marriage was when the "brides" husband was still alive, the second ceremony was four year's after his death. |
|||
|
KathleenBell | Report | 17 Apr 2011 17:58 |
If the bride didn't tell the registrar that she was married then he wouldn't know anything about it and the first marriage would just go ahead as normal. She possibly then decided that when her "real" first husband died she might as well become "legal". You would only know whether the two marriages took place in the same place if you bought the certificates. |
|||
|
InspectorGreenPen | Report | 17 Apr 2011 18:03 |
Not quite sure of the point you are making, but unlike today, when you have to produce various documents, in the past, unless the priest or registrar had suspicions, what you told them was taken as read. Don't forget there were no computers and cross checking records was very time consuming, if not impossible. |
|||
|
Chris in Sussex | Report | 18 Apr 2011 00:05 |
When did the marriages take place?...The time frame would help give a pointer as to the likely 'thinking' at the time. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
SylviaInCanada | Report | 18 Apr 2011 00:59 |
You don't say when these marriages took place ....... but I didn't have to provide any proof that I was "single" when I married in 1967 |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
InspectorGreenPen | Report | 18 Apr 2011 09:24 |
This is from the direct Gov site |
|||
|
KathleenBell | Report | 18 Apr 2011 10:19 |
The details you need to provide for marriage as given by InspectorGreenPen above are what is required today. |
|||
|
Andysmum | Report | 18 Apr 2011 16:51 |
My son got married in the local church in 1997 and the only documentation the Vicar wanted was proof of residence and his baptism certificate. |
|||
|
Liz 47 | Report | 18 Apr 2011 19:37 |
One of my ancestors married in 1877 as a "widow" - her legal husband also remarried. They both lived in the same area. |
|||
Researching: |