Genealogy Chat

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Quick Search

Single word search

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

Family Tree Stolen

Page 1 + 1 of 2

  1. «
  2. 1
  3. 2
ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

Flick

Flick Report 27 Oct 2010 12:21

If you opened your tree to this person, you cannot accuse him of 'stealing'

You gave him access - freely, and must accept the consequences of having done so

Kay????

Kay???? Report 27 Oct 2010 11:59

There really is no need to add living people on a family tree as the word suggests --*genealogy* is history of past lives. a pedigree of ancestors past lives,who we are decended from.

Kense

Kense Report 27 Oct 2010 11:55

I have to say that I find it much more infuriating when wrong information gets copied espescially on Ancestry trees because, if there are more trees that contain those errors than not, then the errors begin to look authentic.

In some cases where the wrong people have been attached to my family, my public ancestry tree contains unconnected branches with the correct data (i.e. if I know John Smith (A) married Mary Jones but there are trees with John Smith (B) marrying her, I do some research on the John Smith (B) family and include it in my tree in the hope that the wrong trees will get corrected and new people will be able to see the correct match).

Also I have found it useful to follow up families of the siblings of my ancestors as I have often found an ancestor staying with an aunt at the time of a census. Also witnesses and informants on certificates can prove to be more closely related than you realise.

Joy

Joy Report 27 Oct 2010 11:43

I understand what you mean by stolen.

I made a mistake, a few years ago, by sending a GEDCOM to a newly found relative. Instead of extracting a relevant part of his GEDCOM to send it someone else, the relative sent his whole GEDCOM to someone else. That someone else put all of its content onto a public site. The owner of that public site refused to remove names of living people. Eventually a few names were removed but not many.

My GEDCOM contained much personal information, not solely what is in the public domain.

I learned my lesson and am careful that I pass on only relevant information.

InspectorGreenPen

InspectorGreenPen Report 27 Oct 2010 11:34

Large tree doesn't mean someone is a name collector.

I have contacts with dozens of members on this site who have trees with over 10,000 names and all would be upset, to to put it mildly, if they were branded as name collectors.

I have been a member on here for several years and have only come across on person who was a name collector, with no interest whatsoever in the genealogy. He wanted me to send him a gedcom of my entire file so he could add it to his tree. Needles to say he got short thrift.

Jane

Jane Report 27 Oct 2010 11:20

I really don't 'get' this. Why on earth would you go on a public site like this one if you don't want to share information? I always ask people if I can use their information but that is just me- others have copied from me without seeking permission and - hey, what does it matter in the long run? Just more people around who know where you come from is all. Most of the information here is pretty sketchy anyway.

Renes

Renes Report 27 Oct 2010 10:45

Ann

They are probably not related to both sides of the family - as has been said - a lot of people are Name Collectors - I saw a tree recently with all my ancestors shown - but is suddenly stopped and appear to be just hanging there

After a few minutes - saw that a female second cousin - twice removed etc living hundred of miles away from our roots - married someone and he had backed tracked the woman over several generations and ended up with my 7th gt grandparents

By no stretch of the imagination was he in any way shape or form related to me

You can actually check - if you go on to his tree and click on his name - click on full tree - and hover your mouse over tree names as you scroll thru the tree - it highlight the relationship - so find your deceased husband and see what it says

Dont worry - these people just want names - however obscure the relationship

I must confess - my Aunt who died very young married a man - who also died very young - and my Mother was very close to their children - my cousins -- I decided to record their paternal ancestors - as a memorial - although of course my Mothers brother in law - was not related to me

After a few entries I discovered they had not originated in Kent - as I thought at first - but actually descended from Dorset - -from the same group of villages as my paternal and maternal grandparents- so I went back to the 1700 s with ours

Anyone seeing my tree would say - why did they bother with their Mothers sisters husband ?

I should add I have a relatively small tree - I am not a name collector

Irene

Mick in the Sticks

Mick in the Sticks Report 27 Oct 2010 09:37

Ann

I wrote a similar thread about 2 months ago about another person not responding to messages. In this particular case it was asking what the relationship was between my parents and a brother who are all deceased that showing up in the Surname Summary search..

I never received a reply which is very frustrating and I doubt if there is probably any direct link other than through some obscure series of marriages.

Having said all that, the one thing I do recognise is whatever the link is or not, other people do have the right to add deceased persons to their tree although I recognise it sometimes can be a bit insensitive. There are individuals who have an almost obsessive nature in trying to make their trees the biggest in the world, irrelevant of how meaningless their trees are.

Deceased persons names cannot be "stolen" as has already been mentioned, they ar publically availiable including their births marriages etc. Provided I knew your date of birth and that you were born in the UK, I could easily recreate your tree back to 1901 in less than 20 minutes, it really is simple as that.

One of the beneifits of being able to do this means I do not need the 1911-21-31 censi to continue research beyond 1901. There has been much debate on various aspects of the 1911 census and beyond to which I simply keep saying you do not need them. However there are many who blindly refuse to accept there is such readily availiable information.

Michael

InspectorGreenPen

InspectorGreenPen Report 27 Oct 2010 09:08

In fact, even info about living persons is in the public domain. The difference is that GR have have a rule that living persons must give their permission for their details to be added to a tree.

Kay????

Kay???? Report 27 Oct 2010 09:00

This crops up almost every week ,!!!! if you dont wish to share dont open your tree,as by doing so you have given permission.if there are no living relatives named and all they have is what can be found in the public domain then its information they could have found themselves and added to their tree and there isnt anything you could do.

Dont open your tree,confirm the link first then just offer wriiten information on how much you wish to share

Dead persons names cant be stolen,they dont belong to anyone exclusively.as they can be found publicly.

InspectorGreenPen

InspectorGreenPen Report 27 Oct 2010 09:00

This topic comes up about as regular as the moon goes around the earth.

The other member hasn't actually stolen anything - he or she has simply copied the details that you so generously let them have access too. This is a risk that you take by putting your tree on-line.

However, members must have permission to add the names of any living relations to their tree.

If a member has added the names of living members of your family to their tree then GR can ask them to remove them. Please send a full list of any living names and their years of birth that have been added without permission to the Genes Reunited support team..

It would also really help the support team if you could send in full details of the person who has added these names. When you see your own name or your family names in the search results, you can on the link to send the tree owner a message. On the next page you'll see their membership number. Please include this name and number in your email to GR.

GR will then contact the member who added them on your behalf.

Ann

Ann Report 27 Oct 2010 08:36

One member of GR has stolen family members from both my late husband's side of the family and mine. All my family is recorded on his tree and I get messages from GR telling me all about the "hot matches" he shares with me.I have taken away permission to view my tree but the damage was already done. I have written to this member asking him how he can be related to both my side of the family and that of my late husband but he does not reply.

I have written more than once to GR to complain about this situation..

Has this happened to anyone else and is there anything I can do about it. I find it very spooky.

I would appreciate any advice.