Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Confused With A Son in Law
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
InspectorGreenPen | Report | 10 Aug 2010 06:50 |
Son in law was used interchangeably with what we would call step son. |
|||
|
Alan | Report | 10 Aug 2010 06:48 |
I had a similar problem and it came down to an error by the transcriber due to the order that the names were listed...Alan |
|||
|
Choccy | Report | 25 Jul 2010 13:59 |
|
|||
|
Choccy | Report | 25 Jul 2010 13:56 |
|
|||
|
Daniel | Report | 25 Jul 2010 13:48 |
My x3 great grandfather Paul Buckley is living with his brother in 1871 but they have seperate surnames. Edwins is Blackburn and Pauls is Buckley. If I go back through the census' the relationship for Edwin is changed from son to son in law. But when I get to the earliest census he is on aged 4 he is still down as a son in law. Did this mean something different back then? |