Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Emily J. Day 1861 look up please
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Hilary | Report | 7 Apr 2010 15:23 |
Looking for Emily Jane Day, father William. Sorry don't know mother's name as got this info off marriage cert. Born abt. 1859 Mile End, Middlesex according to 1881 census. Found her on the1881 census married to Alfred Hoye. Married in 1878. Would like to find her with her family. |
|||
|
CherryBlossom | Report | 7 Apr 2010 16:02 |
Possible in 1871 |
|||
|
Choccy | Report | 7 Apr 2010 16:03 |
|
|||
|
Hilary | Report | 7 Apr 2010 16:05 |
Hi, can't find cert. as have moved & still have loads stuff in boxes. |
|||
|
Choccy | Report | 7 Apr 2010 16:05 |
|
|||
|
Hilary | Report | 7 Apr 2010 16:10 |
Don't think the one born in Marylebone is the right one. On Free bmd there is another Emily Jane Day & she was born in Marylebone. The Depford one looks more likely, she was married in Bethnal Green, so seems right area. |
|||
|
Hilary | Report | 7 Apr 2010 16:12 |
Hi Choccy, yes that is her on 1891 census. The Poplar one looks most likely. |
|||
|
CherryBlossom | Report | 7 Apr 2010 16:12 |
Think Choccy's right and the 1871 is more like it - have deleted the others to avoid confusion. |
|||
|
Hilary | Report | 7 Apr 2010 16:14 |
Thanks Ninja lady. |
|||
|
Hilary | Report | 7 Apr 2010 16:17 |
Thanks Choccy & Ninja lady, looks like you have found her. A labourer sounds more likely. |