Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
pricilla smith 1885
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Netty | Report | 27 Oct 2009 16:30 |
Hi Sheila, birth cert would be a good idea. Maybe the Parents married at a later date. My G Grandparents married 7 years after their first child was born !. Also found this on the 1911 Census !. |
|||
|
Sheila | Report | 27 Oct 2009 15:12 |
thanks netty, |
|||
|
Netty | Report | 27 Oct 2009 13:44 |
You may have this already Sheila, but just incase you haven't............ |
|||
|
Sheila | Report | 27 Oct 2009 13:03 |
thank you all I am very impressed by all you have uncovered so quickly .Cilla was born in wedlock I think her dad was around most of her childhood I believe one or both her parents had a problem perhaps with drink . I am not sure but the gave birth to a great girl . I think her mum was Elizabeth |
|||
|
Irene | Report | 27 Oct 2009 12:06 |
1851 census living Habergham Eaves same place as Bannister family are living in later census. |
|||
|
Irene | Report | 27 Oct 2009 11:42 |
Daniel Bannister married Alice Smith at Burnley 1858 so perhaps her sister gave birth to Pricilla out of wedlock. Irene |
|||
|
Irene | Report | 27 Oct 2009 11:38 |
If you look at the actual image for 1891 for Pricilla it could read age 6 and not 1 as given in the census details. Irene |
|||
|
Netty | Report | 27 Oct 2009 10:48 |
1901 |
|||
|
Netty | Report | 27 Oct 2009 10:26 |
Edit: Thanks Irene. |
|||
|
Irene | Report | 27 Oct 2009 10:13 |
Do you mean 1891 census. Irene |
|||
|
Sheila | Report | 27 Oct 2009 10:11 |
is it possible for a kind person with access to the 1991 census to look up for me. |