Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
HELP! Can't find most of this family on the 1901
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
David | Report | 14 Feb 2009 19:24 |
I cannot find this family except for the father on the 1901 and cannot find any of them on the 1911 |
|||
|
David | Report | 14 Feb 2009 19:33 |
Looking at this again, the 1891 family may not be the same. If they are different it is the Palmer family on the 1881 and 1901 that I am looking for. Elizabeth was my great grandmother, and yes, the difference in age between her and her husband is correct. My ggfather died a month or so after my gfather was born and she then married a much younger man. |
|||
|
PollyPoppet | Report | 14 Feb 2009 22:08 |
1901 CENSUS |
|||
|
David | Report | 14 Feb 2009 23:24 |
Thanks Dollymixture |
|||
|
David | Report | 14 Feb 2009 23:52 |
I have been looking for a marriage for Charles and Jane, and this is the only one I can find that seems possible in the Surrey/London areas |
|||
|
David | Report | 15 Feb 2009 16:38 |
I have looked at the details of any likely looking Jane Palmer but they all are living with their husbands. |