Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
1901 census.
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Patricia | Report | 10 Feb 2009 22:20 |
That`s brilliant, thank you so much. Found her at last. |
|||
|
Patricia | Report | 10 Feb 2009 22:17 |
Sylvia I have thought of that, so I just entered Reigate Surrey and all the names of people living there appeared but no Lilian Wallis or any variation of her name. |
|||
|
SylviaInCanada | Report | 10 Feb 2009 22:17 |
that's a good one!! |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Elaine | Report | 10 Feb 2009 22:15 |
Mistranscribed on Ancestry as Lelian Wallde !!! |
|||
|
SylviaInCanada | Report | 10 Feb 2009 22:11 |
mistranscription of the name or birthplace would be the main reason |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Patricia | Report | 10 Feb 2009 22:10 |
I have looked at the index for the 1901 census on FindMyPast for my Wallis family, searching under Lilian Wallis born 1895 and it appears she is age 6 in Reigate. Yet I cannot find her on Ancestry. Why is this? Any ideas please. |