Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
a paracetamol required
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Kathlyn | Report | 10 May 2008 13:55 |
I am ready to throw something hard & solid at this computer, so a clear head and fresh pair of eyes willing to have a look for the following, would be very much appreciated:- |
|||
|
ErikaH | Report | 10 May 2008 14:01 |
Were they all born in Liverpool? |
|||
|
Kathlyn | Report | 10 May 2008 14:19 |
Hi Reggie, |
|||
|
Janet 693215 | Report | 10 May 2008 20:20 |
The relationship between William, James and Elizabeth and their "parents" is not stated on the 1871 but all other relationships are listed on the page. It could just be an oversight but it could also indicate that they were the children of Richard or Hannahs sibling. Perhaps they could have been orphans. Obviously this wouldn't be the case if you have Williams BC. |
|||
|
Ivy | Report | 10 May 2008 22:42 |
It's tricky, isn't it? |
|||
|
Ivy | Report | 10 May 2008 22:49 |
1901, widower: |
|||
|
Ivy | Report | 10 May 2008 23:02 |
Is it possible that this is the family in 1861? |
|||
|
Ivy | Report | 10 May 2008 23:03 |
- thanks Von, just seen your message, will see if I can find that thread (if it wasn't deleted!) |
|||
|
Ivy | Report | 10 May 2008 23:10 |
Hmm, found a thread from July 2005 which referred to an old Sarah Montgomery thread that listed the missing EDs, but I can't find the thread itself. |
|||
|
Ivy | Report | 10 May 2008 23:13 |
Ancestry has this about the 1861 census: |
|||
|
Janet 693215 | Report | 11 May 2008 00:06 |
I looked at all the bibby 's born 1860 + - 1 year on the 1861 census and none of them seemed to fit. |
|||
|
mgnv | Report | 11 May 2008 06:28 |
The 1861 missing bits (none in Lancs) are identified at: |
|||
|
Kathlyn | Report | 12 May 2008 13:22 |
Many thanks to all who replied to my problem. i am sorry that I am a little late with this thanks, but as I have baby owls hatching I must ensure they are my first priority. |
|||
|
Janet 693215 | Report | 12 May 2008 13:42 |
Kathlyn, get someone on records office to check find my past for you. There are three Williams showing on there for born 1860 +/- 1 in liverpool. Ancestry only has two. |
|||
|
kay | Report | 12 May 2008 13:54 |
Try lancashire BMD.. |