ancestry v. findmypast

Genealogy Chat

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Profile	Posted by	Options	Post Date
Member Since: December 2005 Posts: 14 Send Message	Nicola	Report	23 Mar 2008 16:37
Member Since: December 2005 Posts: 14 Send Message	I know what you mean, Glitter Baby, but neither had been mis-transcribed, it was just that the search facility on Findmypast seemed better...?
Member Since: July 2004 Posts: 33,475 Send Message	GlitterBaby	Report	23 Mar 2008 16:21
	As the records were transcribed by two sets of people then you will get discrepancies.
	Researching: PLEASE DO NOT: send me information concerning your thread on the board as it should be posted on your request where all members can see it. PLEASE DO NOT: ask me for help with lookups as they should be placed on the boards to get the best possible result. PLEASE DO NOT: open your tree just because I have posted information on your thread as I will not be related. THANK YOU. Researching Carter, Cass and Walker in England. Researching Caven, McKill, Sutherland and Will in Scotland.
Member Since: December 2005 Posts: 14 Send Message	Nicola	Report	23 Mar 2008 16:10
Member Since: December 2005 Posts: 14 Send Message	Hi all, I've just spent hours on Ancestry (to which I subscribe) looking for someone in the 1881 census. Went on Findmypast for free and found it in the first search! Is Findmypast better than Ancestry, or was I just (un)lucky?