Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Boy or girl?
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
*~*Chris*~* | Report | 16 Feb 2008 11:07 |
Hi I've also got a whole line of female Nicolas's from Scotland in my tree, the last one being born c1900, this could cause confusion, especially if the parents couldn't read. hope you solve the mystery! |
|||
|
Deb needs a change | Report | 16 Feb 2008 10:04 |
Hi Susan, |
|||
|
Susan | Report | 16 Feb 2008 09:20 |
Yes. I found that one too Margaret but double checking everything on census, Scotlands People and IGI my Nicolas was definitely born in Muthill. |
|||
|
Battenburg | Report | 15 Feb 2008 20:10 |
|
|||
|
Susan | Report | 15 Feb 2008 13:51 |
That's what I was wondering Athena,if Nicolas was examined and was baptised as a boy and then later they decided that she was after all a girl. As for Nicolas and John naming their daughter Nicolas the Scots seem to stick rigidly to their pattern of naming children so 3rd daughter named after Mum!!These are my husband's ancestors and there are so many named John, George or James with the same surname as us it drives me potty trying to sort them out. Will read that article now Margaret. Carol thanks letting me know it happened in your ancestry too. |
|||
|
♥Athena | Report | 15 Feb 2008 12:37 |
I was wondering if perhaps her sex was not clear at birth and after "examination" the child was declared a boy and given the name Nicolas - only to end up being a girl. |
|||
|
Battenburg | Report | 15 Feb 2008 12:19 |
Susan just realised what you meant by on examination. . |
|||
|
Carol | Report | 15 Feb 2008 10:37 |
I have a birth cert 1840 for a Eliza sex girl but is infact my gg/grandfather Elijah |
|||
|
Susan | Report | 15 Feb 2008 10:27 |
Thanks for that Margaret. It was the "att examination son of" that made me think it was odd. I agree that the parents almost certainly couldn't read. It seems that a lot of people couldn't read before 1880/90 looking at the birth and marriage certs I've got. |
|||
|
Battenburg | Report | 15 Feb 2008 10:04 |
|
|||
|
Susan | Report | 15 Feb 2008 09:42 |
Thanks for your help Chris. |
|||
|
Chris in Sussex | Report | 14 Feb 2008 21:07 |
Susan |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Susan | Report | 14 Feb 2008 20:26 |
I have an ancestor Nic(h)olas McFarlane born 1830 in Trinity Gask, Perth. Her parents were John McFarlane and Nic(h)olas Morgan married 1820 in Muthill, Perth. The only birth I can find in Muthill for Nicolas Morgan is a male birth in 1790. The entry in the register reads " att Concraig att examination Nicolas son of William Morgan and Catherine Campbell". All the other entries just give the christian name of the child, and son or daughter of -and names of parents. I know that unfortunately the parent's of a child can sometimes be told the wrong sex of their child at birth even nowadays. Has anyone come across a similar occurence in their ancestry and does anyone know how it would have been dealt with 200 years ago? Any help with this delicate subject would be much appreciated. |