Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|
JaneyCanuck
|
Report
|
8 Jan 2010 18:15 |
Oh, I only dropped in on a couple of threads last night that people commanded my presence in. ;) I am so driven nuts with work still that I'm not really here. You don't want me. You don't want to know how long it's been since I had a shower. I have masses of work to do over the weekend as well (it was due new year's eve, but hey, now it isn't taxed until the next year!) so it will be a few days before - I hope! - I can come back to visit your pain in the bum ancestors here. ;)
Happy belated new year!
|
|
Brian
|
Report
|
8 Jan 2010 08:41 |
Welcome back JaneyCanuck
|
|
Brian
|
Report
|
24 Dec 2009 08:57 |
Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year to everyone in this thread.
Thank you for your help with tracking down my family.
Regards
Brian
|
|
Brian
|
Report
|
19 Dec 2009 22:31 |
Occurs to me that the reason we can't find May Doris Hancock is that she died before the 1911 census.
I've tried on a couple of sites to find a death between 1903 and 1911 without any success; could you take a look for me please.
I'm sure that must be the answer.
|
|
Brian
|
Report
|
15 Dec 2009 20:36 |
First, because I forgot before, thanks to Viv and Janey for their help thus far.
I can't believe how much you have managed to find out.
Second, I have just finished a phone call from the husband of Williams daughter in Canada!
He has been trying to get details of his wifes family for some time with limited success, in fact I could tell him things from this thread. I have sent him a link to GR to look in this thread, and told him how good Janey and Viv are.
Interesting thing, although he knew about Hilda he doesn't know about May Doris.
just when you think things are getting straight ....
|
|
FannyByGaslight
|
Report
|
15 Dec 2009 15:36 |
Info FOUND BY JANEY CANUCK Re Hilda.
Taken from passenger lists on Find My Past Name: Hilda HANCOCK Date of departure: 12 June 1913 Port of departure: London Passenger destination port: Quebec, Canada Passenger destination: Quebec, Canada Date of Birth: 1902 (calculated from age) Age: 11 Marital status: Sex: Female Occupation: Passenger recorded on: Page 18 of 20
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ship: Official Number: Master's name: Steamship Line: Where bound: Square feet: Registered tonnage: Passengers on voyage: CORINTHIAN 111257 R G Bamber Allan Line Steamship Co Ltd Montreal, Canada 27819 5621 0 **************************************************************
Surname: HANCOCK Given Name: Hilda Age: 11 Sex: F Ship: Corinthian Year of Arrival: 1913 Departure Port: London Departure Date: 12 June 1913 Arrival Port: Quebec Arrival Date: 25 June 1913 Party: Dr. Barnardo's Destination: Peterborough, Ontario Comments: Party of 135 girls Notes: The child's surname was illegible or difficult to decipher Source: Library and Archives Canada/Bibliothèque et Archives Canada Reference: RG76 C 1 a and PRO London BT 27/812 (7) Microfilm: T-4799 Type of Record: Passenger Lists/Listes de passagers Group of Children Traveling Together.
|
|
FannyByGaslight
|
Report
|
14 Dec 2009 21:14 |
This is Hilda in 1911 I do believe. She does not appear to have other family with her.
HANCOX, Hilda Louisa Inmate F 9 1902 School Holmslow London
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Registration District: Middlesbrough: Address: Lincoln Villa Westbourne Grove North Ormesby Middlesbro County: Yorkshire (North riding)
|
|
FannyByGaslight
|
Report
|
14 Dec 2009 20:47 |
Hilda Hancock married Frank clark 9th Oct 1924 per the marrige details and if you read all the details from it you will see what her mothers name was(Alice berbeck) and that her father was Hancock. I did look at the original image,but the fathers first name was not down,just initials that had been scored over for some reason,and I couldnt make them out,
Births Mar 1902 --------------------- HANCOCK Hilda Louisa Hackney 1b 576
|
|
Brian
|
Report
|
14 Dec 2009 20:13 |
Hi Viv
Thanks so much for your investigations.
We’ve only just ‘discovered’ Hilda.
With that discovery I’m going to summarise where we are, including some new information. William Hancock was born in London in 1901, we know he was in the UK in 1911
1911 INSTITUTION HANCOCK RALPH 1906 5 Croydon Surrey INSTITUTION HANCOCK WILLIAM 1901 10 Croydon Surrey
There was a younger sister May Doris born in 190X, but she doesn’t appear on the 1911 census.
There is a family story of a girl from the family being sent to Canada at a young age, so the assumption was that May Doris was that girl, sent to Canada before 1911.
We now know that William Hancock left the UK for Canada in 1921, and visited his sister Hilda living in Wallaceburg.
Hilda arrived in Canada in 1913 as an 11 year old, and married Frank J Clark before 1924.
What we don’t know – where was William between 1911 and 1921 what happened to May Doris Who was Hilda
I’m waiting to hear from someone I believe to be the daughter of William Hancock to see if she can give some information on William, May Doris and Hilda.
Maybe she will have family stories from Williams’ early days in the UK.
Regards
Brian
|
|
FannyByGaslight
|
Report
|
14 Dec 2009 09:34 |
My you must be special Brian... Janey has asked me to dump you some info on here as she doesnt have access to it,but I do,I know that woman only likes me for my subs !
Ontario, Canada Marriages, 1857-1924 about Hilda Louise Hancock Name: Hilda Louise Hancock [Hilda Louise Clark] Birth Place: England Age: 21 Estimated birth year: abt 1903 Father Name: Hancock Mother Name: Alice Berbeck Spouse Name: Frank J Clark Spouse's Age: 24 Spouse Estimated Birth Year: abt 1900 Spouse Birth Place: Hope Township Spouse Father Name: Wesley Clark Spouse Mother Name: Sarah Jane Badger Marriage Date: 9 Oct 1924 Marriage Place: Durham Marriage County: Durham Registration district: Durham Family History Library Microfilm: VRMCAN1923_102608
I couldnt see that the correction had been added by a public member,but maybe I look in the wrong place.?
|
|
JaneyCanuck
|
Report
|
3 Dec 2009 17:06 |
Well, this year it was the passenger rail workers who went on strike for Christmas, not the posties, so the mail should be moving. ;)
Hey, if you want to PM me the details, I could look up the phone number and give her a call! I'm in Ontario, and my long-distance plan is 50 cents / 20 minutes. ;)
At least if you get in touch it should solve the mystery of who Uncle Bill was. Even here in Canada, I've had the same sort of thing. When I ran away to university the summer I was 16, my mum arranged for me to board (an hour from home) with an Uncle Bill and Aunt Ollie. I don't think we really knew what relation they were, they were just family of my grandfather. (They were also old and crotchety, and I was young and wild, and that lasted 2 weeks.) It wasn't until 5 years ago when I signed up for Canadian Ancestry and started digging and delving that I sorted out what our relationship was!
|
|
Brian
|
Report
|
3 Dec 2009 16:59 |
Hello – an update having spoken to my cousin about the link to Canada.
Mixed news; my Cousin did not go to Canada as I first understood, however she has been in contact with someone IN Canada, who rings my cousin occasionally. This is the daughter of Uncle Bill, so may well have more information about May Doris after she arrived in Canada. I don’t have a telephone number, but I do have an address in the Ontario area, I’m going to write and see what I can find out.
More news later, but mail to/from Canada in the Christmas period may take time.
|
|
Brian
|
Report
|
29 Nov 2009 18:31 |
Unable to talk to my Cousin at the moment.
I'll find out as soon as I can.
|
|
FannyByGaslight
|
Report
|
29 Nov 2009 12:38 |
One possible ,married, but no wife with him..
11 Census of Canada about William Shorten Name: William Shorten Gender: Male Marital Status: Married Age: 32 Birth Date: Nov 1878 Birthplace: England Relation to Head of House: Roomer Immigration Year: 1909 Tribal: English Province: Manitoba District: Winnipeg City District Number: 24 Sub-District: Winnipeg Sub-District Number: 44 Place of Habitation: 124 Harriet Cant do more at the mo,sorry,maybe later
And as Janey asked in an earlier post..
Her question was: does your cousin have any idea *where* in Canada she visited the aunt?
|
|
Brian
|
Report
|
29 Nov 2009 12:13 |
It occurs to me that William and Alice may have sent May Doris to a relation of Williams who was already in Canada – the Uncle Bill my cousin mentioned.
In which case could this be another William Shorten from an earlier generation?
If May Doris was to become a member of a family in Canada could she have been sent under the name of Shorten ahead of William and Ralph changing their name from Hancock.
I’ve looked through the Canadian sites that Janey sent (thanks Janey) and found three Williams Shortens in the 1911 census –
http://www.automatedgenealogy.com/census11/SurnameSearch.jsp?surname=shorten&province=Manitoba&description=Surname+search+in+1911+Census+of+Canada+in+province+of+Manitoba
http://www.automatedgenealogy.com/census11/SurnameSearch.jsp?surname=shorten&province=Nova+Scotia&description=Surname+search+in+1911+Census+of+Canada+in+province+of+Nova+Scotia
Perhaps one is Uncle Bill? Is there a way of finding where these three were born?
|
|
Brian
|
Report
|
28 Nov 2009 10:00 |
Thanks for all your hard work!
It looks like my early assumption that May Doris was sent to Canada because William Shorten didn’t want her may be too harsh.
If William and Ralph were living in an institution under the Poor Law in 1911 maybe he couldn’t provide for the whole family and sent her to Canada because of her age and sex to give her a better life. The boys were older and more likely to survive.
He wasn’t to know she would have a hard life growing up in Canada.
I’ll talk to my cousin this weekend and see what she remembers.
|
|
JaneyCanuck
|
Report
|
27 Nov 2009 22:42 |
Yup, Ayling was the next one on the list. ;)
So they were in Holborn Union School. For Brian: essentially an orphanage, an institution where children w/o families lived and attended school, operated by the poor law union of the district.
|
|
FannyByGaslight
|
Report
|
27 Nov 2009 22:24 |
Ok ,same place as the Hancocks.
AYLING, Albert Inmate M 7 1904 Scholar London St Lukes
It comes under the "poor law" Thats who the teachers and domestics say they work for/under.
Holborn Union School
|
|
FannyByGaslight
|
Report
|
27 Nov 2009 22:17 |
That one aint coming up on Find my past.
Working on it.
|
|
JaneyCanuck
|
Report
|
27 Nov 2009 21:41 |
ta!
They're the only Hancocks with address London Road Mitcham Surrey.
Looking for the beginning of the list, where the image might give the institution name, this is the first "A" in an institution on London Road Mitcham Surrey .
INSTITUTION ANGUS JAMES M 1904 7 Croydon Surrey
Wanna see whether it does??
|